Describe the overall approach of the diagnostic workflow.
All patients: Establish the diagnosis with routine laboratory studies, cardiac biomarkers, ECG, chest x-ray, and echocardiogram.
If CHF is confirmed, investigate for:
Underlying causes (consider coronary angiogram, chest imaging, and advanced cardiac imaging)
Modifiable risk factors (e.g., hypertension, coronary artery disease)
List routine laboratory studies and their respective findings.
CBC: Screen for anemia and infection.
BMP
Creatinine: normal or ↑
Na: normal or ↓ (hyponatremia can indicate a poor prognosis) [12]
Glucose or HbA1c: may be elevated in diabetes [13]
Liver chemistries: Elevations, particularly of the cholestatic enzymes, can indicate hepatic venous congestion. [14][15]
Inflammatory markers: ↑ CRP can indicate acute infection or inflammation
Fasting lipid studies: Elevated cholesterol is a common finding.
TSH: possibly lowered as a sign of hyperthyroidism
List 2 important cardiac biomarkers.
Natriuretic peptides
Cardiac troponin T or I
Define the natriuretic peptides (NP).
BNP or NT-proBNP (NT-proBNP is a precursor of BNP; either can be used, as long as the correct values are used for interpretation)
What are the indications for NP?
To establish the diagnosis of CHF (alongside echocardiography)
Evaluation of prognosis and disease severity (e.g., level at admission and predischarge)
How are the findings of NP interpreted?
High levels in patients with classic symptoms of CHF confirm the diagnosis (high predictive index).
High levels at discharge and no decrease during hospitalizations may signal worse outcomes.
Raised NPs are seen in a multitude of conditions (e.g., renal impairment, ACS, effects of pharmacotherapy).
Obesity and flash pulmonary edema can lead to normal or decreased NP levels.
Describe the use of troponin T or I.
Elevated levels can suggest ischemia but troponins can be elevated in CHF without acute myocardial ischemia.
Potentially helpful for risk stratification
Last changed2 years ago