Greensill Capitals collapse
Greensill Capital collapsed in March 2021 due to a combination of factors, including allegations of fraudulent activities, the exposure of high-risk investments, and a sudden stop of funding from its key financial backer, Credit Suisse.
The collapse of Greensill Capital raised questions about the due diligence and risk management practices of both the firm and its financial backers, as well as about the broader supply chain finance industry.
It was revealed that Greensill had been providing financing to companies based on invoices for goods and services that had not yet been delivered or paid for, which raised concerns about the quality of its assets and its ability to repay its debts.
Instead of being based on an invoice for a specific purchase, they are based on an expectation that some future invoice may be issued
For which industries can lessons be learned
RDR FIC
Regulators
Deposit Insurers
Rating Agencies
Financiers
Insurance Companies
Corporates
Lessons for Regulators from the Greensill Case
stronger and clear regulation for non-banking segment
Increased transparency in the supply chain finance industry to better understand and monitor the risks
Proactive and faster investigations
Lessons for Deposit Insurers from the Greensill Case
Showed limitations as they only cover depositors and not bondholders
Should consider expanding their coverage to include other types of investors
Lessons for Rating Agencies from the Greensill Case
Rating agencies failed to fully understand the complexity of the supply chain finance industry
Improving their risk assessment
More independent ratings
Lessons for financiers from the Greensill Case
Increase Transparancy
Diversify Clients
Need for more thorough due diligence
Lessons for Insurance Companies from Greensill Case
Understanding all the risks they are covering
Reviewing and adjusting their risk management
Transparency
Lessons for Corporates from Greensill Case
Consider the risks involved and financial condition of their financing partners
Diversifiying their financing sources
Short-term financing for short-term needs
What possible deficiencies in banking regulation and banking supervision does the case of greeensill reveal
Inadequate oversight as regulators failed
Regulatory arbitrage - GC took advantage of loopholes and operated as an unregulated firm allowing them to engage in risky practices
Weak risk management - did not properly assess creditworthiness
What about the role and deficiencies of other gate keepers
rating agencies gave them a investment grade rating
SPV
A special purpose vehicle is a subsidiary created by a parent company to isolate financial risk.
Purpose:
Risk mitigation
Securitization of loans/receivables
easily transfer nontransferable assets
hold companies key properties.
Last changed2 years ago