History: The term “autistic” (1908)
Paul Eugen Bleuler coined terms as schizophrenia, schizoid, autism
from Greek “autos” = self
social withdrawal from schizophrenic adults
History: Folktales
characters of unusual behaviour
literal interpretation of the world
History: Leo Kanner
“childhood autism” or “Kanner syndrome”
description of 11 children in 1943
key features: extreme autistic aloneness + anxiously obsessed desire for the preservation of sameness
further features: excellent rote memory, delayed echolalia, hypersensitivity to stimuli, limitations in activity, repetitive movements, verbalizations, interests, special relations to objects for self-stimulation (-> prevent overload), good cognitive potential although many had learning difficulties
History: Asperger + differences between Kanner’s and Asperger’s observations
same time as Kanner, both made a separation to schizophrenia (Kanner probably drew on his work)
Asperger
Kanner
children spoke like little adults
3 of his children never spoke
clumsy, no fine motor skills
clumsy, poor gross motor performance but good fine motor skills
best at learning when spontaneously; “abstract thinkers”
best at learning in rote fashion (via repetition)
-> early undertanding: Asperger as milder form of autism
-> summary of both observed conditions as in DSM-5’s Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
History: myths and controversies
negative characterisations -> misguided and abusive treatments
“refrigerator mother” as underlying cause of autism
children were taken away from their families + raised in institutions with animalistic conditioning training
main goal: no more typical autistic behaviour
today: ABA therapy (applied behaviour analysis)
History: Grunya Efimovna Sukhareva
“Die schizoiden Psychopathien im Kindesalter”: description of 6 boys -> Sukhareva detected more children with autistic tendencies
goal: examine the connection and difference between shizophrenia and schizoid psychopathy -> BUT afterwards she replaced schizoid psychopathy with autistic psychopathy
social and motor skills training -> progressive treatment
all 6 boys showed preference for their own inner world with each their own talents (e.g. violin player, number memory)
social struggles, no face recognition, less peer interaction, imaginary friends, clowning behaviour
motor impairments + body constitutions
-> well match with today’s DSM-5 criteria even though 100 years ago
postulated cerebellum, basal ganglia, frontal lobes as autonomical substrate of autistic psychopathy
History: Asperger in the Nazi era
Asperger was involved in Nazi policies such as Eugenics/Euthanasia
-> admitted various children to Euthanasia
-> their brains being used post mortem for science
-> his name should not be used anymore to describe a condition today (today it’s ASD anyways)
Behavioural and Biological: diagnostic criteria of DSM-5 and ICD-11
A: impairment in social communication and interaction
B: restrictive repetitive patterns of behaviour
Key points:
atypicalities in social and communication behaviours, restricted and repetitive behaviours, present from a young age onward, sensory sensitivities, possible language or intellectual disability
Behavioural and Biological: diagnosis and prevalence
variability in the way autism presents
standardised assessment tools and in-depth interviews
diagnosis is rare before the age of 3 years
self-identification
prevalence ca. 1% with global variation
Behavioural and Biological: sensory symptoms + associated features
hyper- or hypo-sensitivity
significant obstacles to daily life and/or possibly beneficial
common comorbidities: anxiety, depression, epilepsy, early mortality
Behavioural and Biological: types of autism and the fractionated triad
sub-groups could be beneficial -> better support
larger sample sizes needed
broader autism phenotype (BAP)
captures autistic features in the general population -> higher rates among biological relatives to autistic people
heterogenity of autism = fractionated triad
different behavioural features of autism = multiple dictinct causes (?)
autism = result of a recipe of genetic and environmental factors (?)
Behavioural and Biological: autism and gender
male to female ratio around 5:1; nowadays more around 3:1
belief: females requiring a higher etiological load to mainfest autism
raising awareness that autism may manifest differently in females
possibly significant mental health difficulties for autistic females in adolescence and prior to diagnosis
clinical services conditioned to diagnosing males
further challenge: large proportion of autistic people identify outside of the gender binary
unclear: first generation of autistic people only just growing old
autism diagnosis and intervention standards have drastically changed
lacking knowledge:
links between autism and typical aging processes
research on best care for elderly autistic individuals
autistic adults generally do appear to have a lower quality of life
Behavioural and Biological: behaviour and societal norms
autism: characterized against presumed normative standards
societal norms influence objective research -> false idea of neurotypicality
problematic study design:
implicated external validity and clinical relevance
white, middle/upper class male participants
“super controls”
Behavioural and Biological: biological level
autism: a strongly genetic condition arising from complex interaction of genetic and environmental factors
huge research efforts to find genetic and neural bases of autism; few major breakthroughs
heterogenity of etiology: different types of autism and biological pathways
Behavioural and Biological: contribution of genetics
twin and family studies show genetic component
majority of cases: autism as a result of the action of hundres of common genetic variants
moving away from looking for autism genes and towards polygenic scores
minority of autistic people: rare genetic mutation can be found
heterogenity of autism and small sample sizes present difficulties for research
goal: identifying biomarkers and understanding different biological bases to lead to better therapies
Behavioural and Biological: candidate neurological underpinnings
early brain overgrowth in first 4 years
differences in specific brain regions
differences in structural and functional connectivity
reduced/less coordinated activation across the “mentalising network”
various forms of neuroimaging used
Behavioural and Biological: other biological influences
environmental factors:
rare exposures e.g. to anti-epilepsy drug valproate
birth complications
birth by caesarean
maternal obesity/diabetes
older parental age
range of mechanisms could be cause, e.g. non-causative association, inflammation, gene-related effect
Behavioural and Biological: autism biomarkers
future use: identify autism prenatally or in infancy, identify subtypes
ethical issues: recruitment of infants in higher likelihood groups, how to apply knowledge when biomarker is identified
key focus: pursuit of early biomarkers for early diagnosis
problem: interventions <—> diagnosed population
Behavioural and Biological: atypical brain development in autism
period of early brain overgrowth
brain of autistic children enlarged in total brain volume between ages 2-4
significant increase in hear circumference persisting until age 5-6
period of slowed down growth in childhood
period of accelerated decline in whole brain volume across remaining life span
mixed findings when brain overgrowth begins
differences probably manifest within first 2 years of life, before first behavioural symptoms are observed
Behavioural and Biological: mechanisms underlying brain overgrowth
possibly driven by different tissue types and/or differences in the amount of cerebrospinal fluid
possibly due to accelerated expansion of the cortical surface, enhanced thickening of the cortical sheet, or a combination of both
possible root in cellular microarchitecture: differences in columnar organization of the cortex
possible variations in neuronal density and abnormal cell patterning at the cortical grey/white matter boundary
Behavioural and Biological: early brain overgrowth as a biomarker for ASD?
large heterogenity: significant overgrowth appears to be present only in a minority of autistic people
various methodological confounds that limit transfer to clinical setting, e.g. changes in population and context norms
regional rather than global variation of brain overgrowth may be better suited as a biomarker
Behavioural and Biological: regional neuroanatomy of ASD
individual components underlying autism:
fronto-temporal and fronto-parietal regions
limbic brain regions
fronto-striatal circulatory
cerebellum
many atypical neural structures in autism overlap with regions of the “social and emotional” brain -> deficits in socal cognition
BUT: these differences are not unique or causal for autism!
Behavioural and Biological: classification by biological gender in ASD
selection bias for males in research
gender-specific differences in clinical symptoms: males more externalising + females more internalising behaviours
development of coping strategies in females -> camouflaging their social difficulties
females might have a higher autism threshold (Schwelle)
non-genetic factors counteract genetic liability in females
females and males appear to represent distinct subgroups of autistic individuals -> significant differences in global brain measures found
Behavioural and Biological: prediction of clinical outcomes by structural neuroimaging markers
multivariate pattern classification (MVPC) approaches -> individual predictions
diagnostic information from brain anatoms, functioning and connectivity measures
limitation: binary nature of these approaches
neuroimaging has the potential to transform from a basic research tool into a clinical application
Behavioural and Biological: theories in study about transgender and nonbinary adults
extreme male brain theory of autism
increased systemizing and decreased empathizing
mindblindness theory
impaired theory of mind in autism
Last changed2 years ago