What is the BCBS, what are the Basel Accords?
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) was formed in 1974 to address globalization challenges in financial and banking markets
Basel Accords: Develops guidelines and standards for banks (Basel I, II, III).
Basel 1 (1988)
first global regulatory framework for banks
main focus: credit risk
Minimum capital requirement: It established a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 8%.
introduced the concept of risk-weighted assets to assess the level of risk associated with different types of assets
What is the difference between the Trading and Banking book?
The Amendment BIS 96:
Basel I does not consider market risk
—> amendment introduced capital charge for market risk associated with all items in trading book except
debt and equity traded securities
positions in commodities and foreign exchange
RWA for trading book items computed using VaR
Name Three Pillars with a short description of the Basel 2.
Pillar 1 —>Minimum Capital Requirements
Pillar 2 —>Supervision
Pillar 3 —>Market discipline
Basel 2 Pillar 1
Minimum capital Requirements
—>for credit and operational risk
Operational risk: basic indicator, standardized, AMA
Three approaches for credit risk:
Formula for translating PD, LGD, EAD, M (effective maturity) into a risk weight
Standardized Approach
Banks and corporations treated similarly
Foundation Internal Rating-based
Bank estimates PD, Basel II guidelines determine other variables
Advanced Internal Rating-based
Banks estimate all variables
Basel 2 Pillar 2
Supervision
1. Banks should have process for assessing capital adequacy related to risk profile + strategy for maintaining capital level
2. Supervisor should evaluate point 1 & banks’ ability to monitor & ensure compliance w/ regulatory capital ratios —> take action if not satisfied
3. Supervisors should expect & have ability to require banks to hold capital > min. requirement
4. Supervisors should intervene before capital falls below min. requirement —> remedial action if capital is not maintained or restored
Basel 2 Pillar 3
Market discipline
Banks should disclose:
- Entities in banking group
- Terms & conditions of capital instruments
- Tier 1 capital instruments & amount of capital for them
- Tier 2 capital amount
- Capital requirements for credit, market and operational risk
Basel 2.5 (2010)
Changes in Computation of market risk
Introduction of:
Stressed VaR for market risk
Capital requirements now VaR + sVaR
sVaR from 250 day period of stressed market conditions
Incremental risk charge (ICR)
Ensure that products like bonds & credit derivatives in the trading book have the same capital requirement as if they were in the banking book
Comprehensive risk measure
Ensure that enough capital is kept for instruments depending on default correlations in the trading book
Basel 3 Capital requirements:
Capital Conservation Buffer: Banks are required to maintain an additional capital buffer to absorb losses during periods of stress (additional 2.5%)
Countercyclical Capital Buffer: Provides an additional buffer that can be activated during periods of excessive credit growth to address systemic risks (up to 2.5%)
Leverage Ratio: Introduces a non-risk-based leverage ratio to limit excessive leverage in the banking sector
Ratio of tier 1 capital to total exposure must be > 3%
Basel 3 Liquidity Requirements
Liquidity must be ensured short- and long-term by keeping:
Liquidity Coverage ratio:
High quality assets > cash outflows over 30 days (short-term)
Net Stable Funding Ratio:
Stable funding > required amount of stable funding (long-term)
Basel 3 CVA and systemic risk
Credit Valuation Adjustment:
Adjustment to value of transactions with a counterparty to allow for possibility of a counterparty default
—> Basel III requires market risk capital for CVA risk arising from changing credit spreads
Fundamental review of the trading book: Overview
aims to address shortcomings in the previous trading book framework (specifically under Basel 2.5) and improve the accuracy of capital requirements for market risk
introduction of stressed ES
Expected shortfall (CVaR) (97.5%; 250d) replaces VaR (99%)
2 approach
Introduction of stress-based risk measures
Process for non-modellable risk factors
FRTB // Calculation of ES: IMA
Internal Models approach:
Calculate ES based on overlapping 10-day periods
FRTB // Calculation of ES: Standardized approach
Standardized Approach (Trading desk level)
Instruments with similar risk characteristics are grouped into buckets
capital charge for each desk = sum of
risk charge
default risk charge (to consider jump to default)
residual risk add-on
FRTB // Stress based risk measure
Calculation of ES based on stress periods (like in Basel II.5)
Can take a subset of market variables accounting for 75% of current ES
Es is then scaled up
Basel 3: overview / what was changed?
introduction of two capital buffers
Non-risk measure leverage ratio
Liquidity ratios
market risk capital for CVA
Systemic risk
Last changed2 years ago