What is The Point of valuation? Why do you value a Company?
You value a Company to determiniert its Implied Value according to your views. If this implied value is very different from the company’s current value, then you can invest in the company to make money when the value changes
When public companies already have market caps and share prices. Why bother valuing them?
Market Caps and Share Prices reflect its current value according to the market, but the market might be wrong! So you value the companies to see if the market’s views are correct.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of public comps
Public comps:
Advantages:
based on real market data
quick to calculate and explain
do not depend on far-in-the-future assumptions
Disadvantages:
There may not be truly comparable firms
Analysis will be less accurate for volatile or thinly traded companies
May undervalue companies’ long-term potential
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the precedent transactions method?
based on real prices that the companies have paid for other companies, so it may better reflect the industry trends than public comps
Disadvantage:
There may not be truly comparable transactions, specific deal terms and market conditions might distort the multiples
the data could be spotty(质量不一的,有好有坏的) and misleading
What are the advantages and disadvantages of DCF Analysis
Less subject to market fluctuations, better reflects company-specific factors and Long-Term Trends
Dependent on fair-in-the-Future assumptions,
Disagreement over the proper calculations for key figures like Cost of Equity and WACC
Which of the 3 main methodologies will produce the highest implied values?
A DCF tends to produce the most variable output since it’s dependent on the assumptions made.
Precedent Transactions tend to produce higher values than the public comps because of control premium.
When is a DCF more useful than public comps or precedent transactions?
When the company is mature and has stable, predictable CF
When you lack good public comps and precedent transactions
Notice that you should always build a DCF since it is valuation and the other methodologies are supplemental
Which one should be worth more: a $500 million EBITDA healthcare company or a $500 million EBITDA industrials company? (Assume the growth rates and margins are the same)
To generalize this problem. Normally the healthcare company will be worth more
Healthcare is a less asset-intensive industry. That means the company’s CapEx and Working Capital requirements will be lower, and its FCF will be higher (closer to EBITDA)
Healthcare tends to be more of a “growth industry” than industrials. Although the discount rate might be higher , the higher expected growth rates and lower asset intensity would make up for that
People say that the DCF is intrinsic valuation, while public comps and precedent transactions are relative valuation. Is that correct?
No, not exactly.
The DCF method depends less on the market than the other methodologies, but there is still some dependency
1) The Discount Rate used in the DCF is usually linked to peer companies (market data), and
2) If you use the Multiples Method to calculate Terminal Value, the multiples are also linked to peer companies.
Last changed2 years ago