Art. 23
Compostition of the UNSC
initially: 5 permanent and 6 non-permanent members
-> P5: Republic of China, French Republic, Soviet Union, UK, USA
today 5 permanent and 10 non-permanent members
-> P5: People’s Republic of China, French Republic, Russian Federation, UK, USA
non-permanent members elected by UNGA for a two-year term by geographic regions
3 Africa, 2 Asia-Pacific, 1 Eastern Europe, 2 Latin America and Caribbean, 2 Western Europe and Other
every year 5 new members
no immediate re-elections
term starts 1 January
-> consistent practice: elected members can participate in meetings 3 month before term begins
acquire better understanding of working methods
no voting or participation in closed meetings
Art. 24
primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security
‘confer on the Security Council’
delegation of powers by all UN members to the UNSC
‘primary responsibility’
duty to act on behalf of the member states
primary but not exlusive -> not the only body dealing with international peace & security
ICJ > peaceful settlement of disputes and avoiding war through judicial means
Secretary-General > represents UN and engages in negotiations to avoid war
UNGA > steps in when UNSC is blocked through Uniting for Peace
‘in accordance with the Purposes and Principles’
UNSC has to act in accordance with the provisions and does not have limitless power
-> creation of Ombudsperson
some argue: there are no limits to the power
‘reports to the General Assembly’
annual reports of the UNSC to the UNGA -> no legal consequences
enhances accountability, promotes dialogue
resolutions, meetings, missions -> account of what UNSC did over the year
written by Secretariat but introduction politically negotiated by UNSC members
Art. 25
legal basis for binding decisions
Does it apply to all decisions?
literal interpretation: yes
dominant view and subsequent practice: not all of them impose binding obligations, only when ‘acting under Chapter VII’
Art. 27
voting
‘a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting’
literal interpretation: even permanent members should, but never do -> Russia, but also UK and US
‘concurring votes of the Permanent Members’
legal basis for veto right
veto only applies to substantive matters (difficult: agenda-setting)
transferring Ukraine to UNGA as a procedural decision in resolution 2623 (2022) -> no veto
does it have to be affirmative (in favor)?
subsequent practice: allows for abstentions
-> Veto = only a vote against
-> in order to pass: nine votes in favor with no P5 against
Art. 29
subsidiary organs
sanctions committees, standing committees, working groups etc.
-> e.g. 1718 Sanctions Commitee (DPRK), Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC), Non-Proliferation Committee
sanctions committes support UNSC in the monitoring of adopted sanctions
mirror the composition of the UNSC
-> experts instead of diplomats
commitees can and usually do create expert bodies with independent UN staff to assist the committee
e.g. CTED in CTC
working groups usually less resourced
e.g. Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Questions
usually created when no agreement to create a committee
decisions taken without a vote by consensus
create recommendations and reports to UNSC but cannot adopt binding decisions
but can implement and thus take decisions based on their mandate (placing people on sanctions lists)
close cooperation with other networks and organizations (cooperation with civil aviation, banks etc. to deal with travel bans and asset freezes)
Art. 30
rules of procedure
council adopts own rules of procedure
Last changeda year ago