bring the following approaches / methods to language into the right chronologicsl order and name one or two features of each approach.
direct method
task-based language teaching
grammar translation method
focus on form
CLT
post-method
audiolingual approach
Imagine you are supposed to introduce the simple past. What would a typical teaching scenario look like for each approach?
balanced CLT
strong CLT
?
Language acquisition:
development of language proficiency in an informal, natural, uncontrolled setting without instruction
Language learning:
development of language proficiency in an institutional, controlled setting with instruction
explaining language acquisition - three perspectives
1) Behaviourism (Skinner 1957)
2) Innatist Perspective: Universal Grammar (Chomsky 1959)
3) Constructivist Perspective: The usage-based perspective (Tomasello 2003, 2006)
Behaviourism
the logical problem of language acquisition
• Children learn a language despite inadequate data:
– false starts, incomplete sentences, slips of the tongue
• “Poverty of the stimulus” (Chomsky)
• the environment only contributes in the sense that caretakers speak to the child
• adult correction plays virtually no role in language acquisition
Innatist perspective: It’s all in your mind (universal grammar)
• Language develops in the child just as other biological functions develop, but it has a separate faculty in the brain: Language Acquisition Device (LAD)
• Universal Grammar: innate ability to discover the underlying rules of language system on one’s own
• Chomsky: Language is governed by abstract principles; ‘government’ is a syntactic relationship between a governor and an element that is governed.
“Words and rules approach”
Identity Hypothesis
first language acquisition - an example
Mother: Shall we play with dolls?
Lucy: Play with dolls.
(mother attends to her daughter and starts playing with her)
cognitive / constructivist perspective
• „Cognitive or constructivist approaches focus on learning processes on the level of the invidual mind without assuming that there is a language acquisition device.“ (Grimm et al. 2015: 45)
two perspectives on how languages are acquired (innatist perspective / cognitive perspective):
Piaget’s cognitive constructivism
• Developmental stages: What learners can and cannot understand at different ages, how learners develop cognitive abilities
• Learners construct their own knowledge through experience
• Creation of schemes and mental models of the world which are changed and enlarged through assimilation and accomodation
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory
differences Piaget / Vygotsky
How to explain Lucy’s utterance from a usage-based perspective
Answers from a usage-based perspective on a first language acquisition
• The vast majority of young children’s early language is organized around concrete, item-based linguistic schemas (e.g. Play with Y) – verb island construction
• children construct more abstract linguistic constructions (e.g. NP= Det +N) only gradually and in piecemeal fashion
• As children imitatively learn concrete linguistic expressions from the language they hear around them, they use their general cognitive and social-cognitive skills
– to categorize,
– schematize and
– creatively combine these individually learned expressions and structures.
Stages of first language acquisition (Tomasello 2006)
From building up to breaking down: the usage-based perspective (Tomasello)
The most basic phenomenon of language
– people make utterances to one another on particular occasions of use
– When people repeatedly say “similar” things in similar situations, what may emerge over time is a pattern of language use.
Current perspective on first language acquistion
• L1 acquisition starts with item-based constructions
• Imitative learning is not simply repeating or mimicking the surface form of adult utterances – children reproduce adult language and use it for the same communicative function
• After some time with exposure children begin to
– discover patterns in the language they are hearing
– form some kinds of abstract categories and schemas.
• Children also combine various kinds of linguistic constructions creatively, involving both concrete and abstract constructions of varying levels of complexity.
• “Say what I say”: Learning is habit formation. Imitation + positive reinforcement= language learning
• “It’s all in your mind!” Universal grammar is triggered by the environment and enables you to “build up” sentences with the help of meaningful words and abstract, meaningless rules.
• “It’s all about using language, understanding communicative intentions and functional roles”. Grammar is constructed by “breaking down” concrete pieces of language into abstract categories and schemas.
Which of the three perspectives of L1 acquistion do you thin are relevant for the L2 classroom?
Which processes can we assume to be active or available to L2 learners?
Last changeda year ago