b) That’s-not-all-folks
What is the definition of entrpreneurial teams?
at least two individuals
active part in the creation and development of a business
key role in strategic decisions
equity ownership (usually more than 10%)
What are three questions arisisng from the entrpreneurial team journey?
How to find team members?
How to set up the team?
How to manage the team?
What makes a good team composition?
heterogeneity vs. homogeneity
getting ahead vs. getting along
always depends on the preferences
typically founding together with people we konw -> getting along
but uncertainty can be there wheter you get along with people you don’t know or get ahead with people you get along with
Teams based on strong ties - What are the benefits?
often connected to more psychological safety
enjoy that you avoid one type of uncertainty (relational uncertainty)
build on joint values, connect them to your firm values, and your firm’s culture
Teams based on strong ties - What are the challenges?
learn to have fights (relationship or task conflict)
reflect about old and new roles
speak early about potential changes in team composition
make sure to include others, such as future team members, employees
What can help to professionalize relationships and to build up team?
team charter and co-founder agreement
Teams based on weak ties - What are the benefits?
enjoy flexibility in search for potentail partners
maximize your team’s human capital
Teams based on weak ties - What are the challenges?
make sure to understand others’ values and vision
define your relationship and potential transformations
discuss rules and roles to establish fairness and trust
think about introducing certain rituals and routines
What are examples for questions that could be answered in a team charter/ co-founder agreement?
(working on the evnture/working together/future)
Team set up - How does equity distribution in entrepreneurial teams work?
distribution of equity is the entrepreneurs’ “first deal”
typically, teams split quickly and agree on equal split without longer discussions
negotiations about equity are often emotional end even stressful
besides money -> power and control crucial issues
What are two criteria/orientations for the equity split?
backwards orientation
forwards orientation
What is characteristic of backwards orientation?
idea premium
capital contribution
opportunity costs
=> more certainty about contributions
=> but not necessarily agreement
What is characteristic of forwards orientation?
prior experiences
level of comittment
titles
=> “when the pie is split, 95% of the work required for success remains in the future.”
What are two different ways to handle the timing of the equity split?
split earlier
split later
What is characteristic for an earlier equity split?
attract team members with an equity incentive
previous work experience with co-founders in another start-up
time for calm negotiation before pressure to split
What is characteristic for a later equity split?
team member’s contributions and commitment not clear in the beginning
future incentives are available
business model and roles will form over time
no regenerations are necessary after fundamental changes
Static vs. dynamic split - How can a split be dynamic?
uncertainty and changes in team members contributions
Static vs. dynamic split - How can a split be kept lees dynamic?
vesting can help to keep equity split fair over time because founders need to earn equity stakes
advantages if team members leave early (unvested portion can be reallocated)
not perfect, but protection for all team members
What can vesting be based on?
based on time
based on milestones
Team management - How can communication of vision in the entrepreneurial team be handled?
vision congruence
vision incongruence
What is vision congruence?
What is vision incongruence?
What are two types of conflicts that can arise in entrepreneurial teams?
task conflict
relationship conflict
What is content of task conflict and what are the consequences?
content:
disagreements about content of team tasks
including differences in viewpoints, ideas and opinions
consequences:
-> conflicts increase exchange of ideas, decision quality and venture performance
What is content of relationship conflict and what are the consequences?
interpersonal incompatibilities
tension
animosity
annoyance among team members
-> conflicts reduce trust, cooperation and venture performance
Which 3 factors can emerge team conflict?
naive realism (“facts are on my side”)
false consensus (“anyone would agree that….”)
actor-observer bias (“he is always so difficult”)
What does effective aka constructive communication look like compared to destructive communication?
Last changeda year ago