Is the US like the EU?
It was like the EU under the first US constitution, Articles of Confederation.
Like an intenational treaty all states had
full sovereignity, independence, every power, jurisdication and right, as longs as its not delegated.
Therefore each state could withdraw if it choosed (as with Brexit, under TEU Art 50)
But the Articles of Confederation were replaced in 1789 by the second US Constitution
has no equivalent of state sovereignty provision in Art 2.
It is passed in the name of ‘We the People of the US’, not the 13 states.
any amendments => agreement from most of the states.
Beschreibung: Englischer König sitzt auf einem Pferd und versucht es zu züchtigen, weil das Pferd ihn abschütteln will
Interpretation: Pferd = Amerika; englischer König = Kolonist => amerikanisches Volk ist das Souverän und kann sich sein Oberhaupt aussuchen.
smaller states wanted equal votes to elect the president (Senate); larger states wanted votes proportional to population (House of Representatives)
compromise => Electoral College seats = Senate seats + House seats + three for Washington D.C. (determined by the 23rd Ammendment in 1964)
currently 538 electors
Representatives and senators may not be electors
usually loyal party members with other political duties
the winner in the electoral college becomes the president
If there isn`t a clear winner, the issue is resolved in the House
You need to win a majority of Electors (key number: 270 votes in te Electoral college)
in rare cases: ignore the election result and the state regulation and make their own decision (= faithless electors)
Upper house = Senate => all states are represented by two senators
-> elected every six years
-> are elected by the states
Lower House = House of Representatives => each state gets at least one representative; for every 30,000 inhabitants one representative
-> elected every two years by the districts (one district = 30,000 inhabitants)
-> House of Representatives has the sole right to conduct impeachment proceedings
US has no nationally elected legislators
No national party lists
No-one votes for ‘Democratic Party’ or ‘Republican Party’: always for a particular individual for the House or the Senate
This often means strong state loyalties
the only nationally elected mandate
Presidential system
President = executive
four-year term of office
Elected together with the Vice President
presidential candidates may not be residents of the same state
Requirements: born in the USA, at least 35 years old, resident in the USA for 14 years
Parliamentary system => Germany
Voters elect the legislature; the legislature selects the head of the executive (Prime Minister, Chancellor etc.)
Executive therefore has majority support in the legislature
Legislature may remove head of the executive for any reason, by majority => e.g. konstruktives Misstrauensvotum
Cabinett => Collegial body: being in the Bundestag or being part of the government is compatible
Voters elect the legislature, and the head of the executive, separately
Executive may or may not have majority support in the legislature
Legislature may only remove head of the executive in special circumstances e.g. serious crime (“impeachment”) => not possible in principle
Cabinett => Advisory body: being in the Congress is not compatible
What principle governed amendments to the Articles of Confederation
Unanimity across the states.
When did the US constitution come into effect?
Upon ratification by 9 of 13 states.
First-past-the-post electoral rules favour two-party systems.
Proportional representation voting system: Election by candidates via lists drawn up by parties => elective offices filled exactly in proportion to the votes
majority representation system: The candidate with the most votes is elected to the body to be elected.
Ambition must be made to counteract ambition
Separation of government power = not a US-American idea => comes from "celebrated" Montesquieu
ultimate sovereignty = people, therefore the president is directly elected
no part of the government has a higher claim to power
The executive and both legislative houses have their own electoral mandates
the most important things cannot be done by one branch of power alone => mutual control of the branches of power
even the most important offices => President always needs the approval of the Senate or the House of Representatives
When tea was served hot, a shot was poured onto the saucer because it cooled down quicker, so people could drink it before drinking from the cup
Senate = cooling saucer
House of Representatives = hot cup
House => two years
President => every four years
Senate => every six years; 1/3 every two years
US Supreme Court is constitutionally required
case citations contain ‘US’
Underneath Supreme Court, Circuit Courts of Appeal
currently 13 Circuit courts.
case citation contains ‘F.2d’ or ‘F.3d’
District courts: lowest level of federal courts.
currently 94 district courts.
case citation including ‘F. Supp.’
two district courts have no numbers => federal district court and DC district court (deals with government departments)
=> (Common law system, so lawyers routinely refer directly to the case reports as legal sources)
Definition: groups, within society, that seek their own interest at the cost of others or society as a whole
Argumentation:
if the faction is a minority, the majority can control it
But if the faction is a majority, what controls it?
For Madison, a large republic was safer here
Large size = more factions, in more states
So harder for any one faction to gain decisive control
Problem:
the majority is not always right
this argument assumes politics will remain state-based
Political parties essentially did not exist at the time Madison wrote his argument …
first ten amendments as a package = Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791
freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, neutrality of the Confederation in religious matters
militia as an alternative to the army => right of citizens to own weapons and defend themselves
no quartering of soldiers in houses without the consent of the owner or statute => never used
inviolability of the home
5-8. rights in criminal prosecution
9. the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be construed to deny or diminish other rights of the people.
-> Criticism: Rights are only reduced to the Amendments, hence 9th Amendment => There are other rights
reservations of power for the states and the people
Why is it so difficult to amend?
Also: 2/3 der beiden Häuser schlagen vor + 3/4 der gesetzgeberischen Körperschaften der Einzelstaaten ratifizieren => Hier: Kongress schlägt vor
Oder: 2/3 der gesetzgeberischen Staatskörperschaften schlagen vor + 3/4 der Einzelstaatkonvente ratifizieren => Hier: beruft einen Konvent
Congress shall have the power:
Fiscal Power: To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to provide for the discharge of the Revenue, the national Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be laid uniformly throughout the Territory of the United States;
Commerce Clause: to regulate commerce with foreign countries, among the several states, and with the Indian tribes
Commerce Clause => to be understood broadly and differently
Necessary and Proper Clause: To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Exercise the foregoing Powers, and all other Rights vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Branch thereof, or in any Officer thereof.
=> These three are the only available constitutional basis for many actions of the US federal government => are often uncertain, e.g. what does "commerce" mean?
Last changeda month ago