Buffl

Baumeister Proteinbiosynthesis DNA

JP
by Julius P.

Many eukaryotic transcriptional repressor proteins differ from prokaryotic repressors in the way they block transcription. Please describe the mode-of-action of a typical bacterial repressor and at least three ways, how eukaryotic repressors can work.

Bacterial Repressor: A typical bacterial repressor, such as the lac repressor in Escherichia coli, usually functions by binding to a specific DNA sequence known as the operator. The operator is positioned near/in the promoter region of the target gene. The binding of the repressor to the operator physically obstructs the RNA polymerase from binding to the promoter, preventing transcription initiation. The repression is often released when a small molecule, known as an inducer, binds to the repressor, causing a conformational change and releasing the repressor from the operator, allowing transcription to proceed.

Eukaryotic Repressors: Eukaryotic repressors operate in the more complex environment of the eukaryotic cell nucleus. Their mechanisms of action are diverse and can involve various interactions with DNA, other proteins, or chromatin structure. Here are three ways eukaryotic repressors can work:

  1. Direct DNA Binding and Steric Hindrance: Eukaryotic repressors may bind directly to specific DNA sequences in the promoter regions of target genes. This binding can lead to steric hindrance, preventing the assembly of the transcriptional machinery or blocking the binding of activators. The repressor-DNA interaction can also recruit co-repressor complexes that modify chromatin structure, making the DNA less accessible for transcription.

  2. Recruitment of Co-Repressor Complexes: Eukaryotic repressors often recruit co-repressor complexes, which contain enzymatic activities responsible for modifying chromatin structure and suppressing transcription. For example, histone deacetylases (HDACs) within co-repressor complexes can remove acetyl groups from histone tails, leading to a more condensed chromatin structure that restricts access to the transcriptional machinery.

  3. Interference with Activator Proteins: Eukaryotic repressors can interfere with the function of activator proteins. Activators typically bind to enhancer regions of DNA and stimulate transcription. Repressors may compete with activators for binding to these enhancer elements or physically interact with activators, preventing them from initiating transcription. This competitive binding or physical interaction can modulate the balance between activation and repression.


Human geneticists have identified a polymorphism in the human gene Ras and found that this polymorphism correlates with an increased likelihood to develop cancer. Ras is represented by homologous genes in all known multicellular model organisms, its C. elegans name, e.g., is let-60. Your bioinformatician provides you with the Ras cDNA and protein sequences and information about the nature of the polymorphism. You want to study the function/dysfunction of this gene (or its homolog) in a reverse genetics approach using a model organism, either Drosophila or C. elegans.

a. What is a gene polymorphism? Why does a gene polymorphism not always interfere with the function of the affected protein?

b. Describe four principal ways to manipulate, using reverse genetics, the activity of this gene, its isoform, or its homolog in your model organism and one advantage or one disadvantage of each method.

c. Which information do you need in addition, if you want to find out whether the particular mutation also affects the function of the homologous gene in Drosophila or C. elegans?

a. Gene Polymorphism:

  • A gene polymorphism is a naturally occurring genetic variation within a population. It refers to the presence of multiple alleles or sequence variants at a specific locus in the DNA sequence of a gene. Gene polymorphisms can include single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, deletions, or other types of genetic variations.

  • A gene polymorphism does not always interfere with the function of the affected protein because not all variations in the DNA sequence lead to changes in the encoded protein. Silent mutations, synonymous SNPs, or variations in non-coding regions may have no impact on protein function. Additionally, some polymorphisms may result in conservative amino acid substitutions that do not alter the overall function of the protein.

b. Reverse Genetics Approaches in Model Organisms (Drosophila or C. elegans):

  1. RNA Interference (RNAi):

    • Method: Introduce double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) specific to the target gene (let-60/Ras) to trigger RNAi-mediated gene silencing.

    • Advantage: Quick and relatively simple. Allows for the knockdown of gene expression.

    • Disadvantage: Potential for off-target effects, and knockdown may not be complete.

  2. Gene Knockout by CRISPR/Cas9:

    • Method: Use CRISPR/Cas9 technology to induce targeted double-strand breaks and create loss-of-function mutations.

    • Advantage: Precision in generating specific mutations. Enables the complete loss of gene function.

    • Disadvantage: Possibility of off-target effects, and the process may require optimization.

  3. Transgenic Overexpression:

    • Method: Introduce an additional copy of the wild-type or mutant gene into the organism for gain-of-function studies.

    • Advantage: Allows the investigation of the effects of increased gene dosage.

    • Disadvantage: May lead to artificial overexpression effects and may not accurately reflect endogenous regulation.

  4. Allelic Series or Mutant Allele Studies:

    • Method: Generate and study different alleles with varying degrees of functionality (e.g., hypomorphic alleles, missense mutations).

    • Advantage: Allows the assessment of the gene's dose-dependent effects on the phenotype.

    • Disadvantage: Generating a range of alleles may be labor-intensive, and the specific effects can be allele-dependent.

c. Additional Information for Cross-Species Analysis:

  • Conservation of Amino Acid Residues: Identify conserved amino acid residues affected by the polymorphism in the human Ras gene and check if these residues are conserved in the homologous genes (let-60/Ras) of Drosophila and C. elegans.

  • Functional Domain Conservation: Assess whether the polymorphism lies within functional domains that are conserved across species.

  • Phenotypic Analysis in Model Organisms: Perform functional studies in the model organisms to examine whether the introduced mutation recapitulates the cancer-associated phenotype observed in humans.

  • Complementation Assays: Conduct complementation assays by expressing the wild-type human Ras gene in model organisms carrying the mutation and vice versa to determine if the cross-species expression rescues or exacerbates the phenotype.


Author

Julius P.

Information

Last changed