Ohio State leadership approach - Goals and leadership dimensions
Goals:
Identification of typical behavioral patterns of leaders
Leadership dimensions:
Performance Orientation (Initiation of strucutre)
Employee Orientation (Consideration)
Ohio State leadership approach - Performance Orientation, Employy Orientation
Performance Orientation - Behavioral patterns:
Goal setting
Prioritizing of task
Delegation
Employee assessment
Emoloyee Orientation - Behavioral patterns:
Respect and appreciation
Consideration
Interpersonal relationships
Behavioral patterns are not mutually exclusive!
Ohio State leadership approach - Four Basic Styles within Two Dimensions
Ohio State leadership approach - Authoritarian Leadership Style
Goal setting by leader
Perfomance rush
Employee interests minor important
Example: Firefighter, Army
Ohio State leadership approach - Relationship-oriented Leadership Style
Personal well-being of employees
Positive climate
Leader as care-taker
Example: Family Business, SME (Small- and midsize Enterprise)
Ohio State leadership approach - Bureaucratic Leadership Style
Large organization/government
Process orientation
Impersonal climate
Example: President, politicans
Ohio State leadership approach - Cooperative Leadership Style
People - performance - balance
Employee participation
(Example: Project Manager in an IT-Company)
Ohio State leadership approach - Extension of leadership dimension
An Extension to Customer orientation:
-> Customer-oriented leadership means:
Examplification
Permanent emphasis
Recognition
Alignment
Ohio State leadership approach - 5 typical leadership profiles
Ohio State leadership approach - The Authoritarian
Characteristics:
high performance and customer orientation combined with low employee orientation
limited development of a customer-oriented attitude by employees
no alignment between goals and task for employees
Ohio State leadership approach - The Softy
high customer and employee orientation
low level of performance orientation
Creation of certain prerequisites for anchoring customer orientation in the attitudes and behavior of employees.
too little support for employees (e.g. by agreeing on objectives or suggesting measures) to be able to achieve performance success through customer orientation
Ohio State leadership approach - The Kicker
attaches importance almost exclusively to performance that can be measured quantitatively
attaches low relevance to employee and customer orientation if these are soft
almost impossible for employees to internalize or even live customer orientation
Ohio State leadership approach - The internal optimizer
overall cooperative behavior of leader causes a relatively high motivation of the employees
customer orientation is neither exemplified by the leader nor is it explicitly promoted in his/her own area of responsibility
focus on the optimization of internal processes
customer orientation is largely neglected
GRID leadership model - Two core dimensions of leadership, basic idea
Two core dimensions of leadership:
Objective and rational orientation: concentration on tasks
Socio-emotional orientation: focus on interpersonal aspects
Basic idea:
Best mix between objective and socio-emotional orientation is key
GRID leadership model - 5 leadership Styles
GRID leadership model - Typical leadership profiles
GRID leadership model - Critical Review
Contingency theory - Idea and basic assumptions
Idea:
Fit between leadership and context required
Basic assumptions:
Distinction between task and relationship motivated leaders
Measurement via Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale
Situational factors:
leader-member relationship
leader’s position power
task structure
Contingency theory - Leadership Style Classification
Contingency theory - Critical Review
Limited evidence:
Confirmation only under laboratory conditions
No confirmation in real environment
Limited implications for business practice:
Average LPC value scores are correlated with more leadership success than high or low LPC value scores
Path goal theory - basic assumptions
Goal acceptence is key
Goal should bring personal benefits
Path goal theory - Four important leadership styles
Supportive leader behavior
Directive leadership
Result-oriented leadership
Participatory leadership
Path goal theory - leadership and leadership success
Path goal theory - Managerial Implications
Maturity model - Basic idea
Extension of Ohio State Leadership approach
→ employee vs. performance orientation
Employee maturity matters
→ “functional” employee maturity- Can?
→ “psychological” employee maturity – Want to?
Maturity model
Maturity model - Sample Measurements for Employee Maturity
Maturity model - Critical Review
High demands on leader:
adaption to maturity of employees requires a variety of leadership styles
High analytical capability needed
No confirmation of validity of theory
Operationalization unclear, lacking validity of instruments
Last changed4 months ago