Expectancy value formula
probability x value = expectancy value
what speaks against the expectancy x value theories
expectancy value is the same —> most people choose non risky option since they are risk aversive
subjective value also plays a role!
subjective expected utility (SEU)
expectancy x subjective value = expected value
classical normative theory
but: descriptive theories from behavioral economics
actual decision making deviates from this imperative
ecological rationality is not mathematical rationality!
according to seu
in case of risk, best decision depends on
probability
subjective utilit
Axioms
Complete order
cancellation principle
invariance
dominance of A /irrelevance of unpreferred alternatives
1. Cancellation Principle
a. Preference ranking is independent of shared consequences
food example, waiting time beforehand should not impact choice
all options have to be comparable by common metric
have to be transitive to each other —> rankable
changes under circumstances
framing of the options is irrelevant to subjective value
Asian disease problem:
even though exact same outcome people choose differently if option is framed as people living or dying (dying —> people dont chose it)
dominance of A / irrelevance of unpreferred alternatives
a. If A has a higher utility than B, presenting C in addition will not change the preference order
wine bottles
Evaluation SEU
wenn structured decision problems like lottery paradigm
applied to domains other than financial —> social or physical —> unclear
focus = structure (input-output) instead of the process
Alternatives to SEU
bounded rationality
ecological rationality
- Bounded Rationality
o Satisficing instead of Optimizing
o Option that we are happy enough with
o Satisfied while sacrificing
o Ignore some dimensions; take dimensions that subjectively are most important
- Ecological Rationality
o Decision heuristics are adapted to natural contexts
Why do economics need brains?
SEU inaccurate
Examples why neuroscience important for economy
drug addict study
prisoner dilemma
coca cola
punishment conveys utility
charitable giving and paying taxes conveys utility
Drug addicts /cocaine
ratings of craing and liking
hardly any overlapt betweed rush circuit and craving circuit
linking and craving is not unidimensional but independent of othe another
activation in ventral striatum (reward)
CC cooperative & cooperative
CD cooperative & defective
same consequences but when played against a computer huge deviation from activation in ventral striatum
Coca cola
when they thought they were given pepsi
expectancy shapes brain activation patterns even though same drink
CONTEXT MATTERS; YOU DONT EVALUATE THE ACTUAL THING YOU CONSUME
Punishment conveys utility
punishing other people but having to pay for the punishment
costly for them but altruistic since benefits for other people
reward receptors of the brain activated even though losing money
Charitable giving and paying taxes conveys utility
mandatory charity vs not mandatory
mandatory and non-mandatory charity both produce satisfaction —> taxpayers?
Homo economicus theory presumes:
endless
life
time
processing capacity
storage
Context-independent judgment
absolute judgment
unidimensional valuation
no curiosity
no prosocial motivation
Last changed3 months ago