good or bad by nature?
division into good and bad is misleading
most people are in between good and bad —> normal distribution
extremes are altruism on the other
dictator game Engel Metaanalysis
good -> sharing
bad -> keeping to self
metaanalysis
36% completely egoistic
16% half and half
distribution can be shifted to more egoistic side —> racial problems
distribution can be shifted to more altruistic side —> after compassion training
Marsh’s talk
continuum in caring
extreme egoists (psychopaths) to extreme altruists
relates altruism to parental care instincts
evolutionary origins
lactation requires proximity, cuddling
oxytocin promotes maternal care
there are proximal triggers that generealize
infantile features
adult distress
allows alloparenting
psychopaths marshs talk
no concern for welfare of others
no recognition of fear —> no learning through punishment
smaller amygdala volume
less brain activation to fearful faces
altruists marshs talk
higher valuation of others in economic task
highly sensitive face/fear recognition
lower sensitivity for anger
larger amygdala & higher response to fearful faces
proximal triggers multiple channels
face
vocalization
posture
—> nonverbal cues convey acute distress
—> increased similarity to an infant
—> triggers empathy in other people
different species less care to more care
offspring
precocial vs. atricial
alloparenting limited vs. extensive
oxytocin synthesis low
oxytocin recepters low density in central amygdala &ventral striatum
a. volume small
amygdala and insula responsiveness to others distress low
personality callous vs. compassionate
social discounting function steep vs. shallow
sensitivity to others distress low vs high
developmental factors harsh, neglectful parenting
group membership not shared with beneficiary, social closeness to object of care
distress experienced by object of care
mature robust infantile or vulnerable
mechanism Marsh
empathy
inclusion of others in self
justice sensitivity
anterior insula
temporo-parietal junction
oxytocin
periaqueductal grey
anterior cingulate cortex
amygdala
ontogeny
heritability
little socialization
stability over time
adaptive value
SEU
survival of the fittest
reciprocity and inclusive fitness (kinship care)
phylogeny
differences presocial and altricial species
how are most individuals in reality in human nature
prosocial —> 46%
usually generous —> 15%
always selfish 39%
when looking at svo angles in studnets —> 85% prosocial
they want to
maximize benefits for self and others
minimize inequality
social value orientation
mapped onto two dimensions orthogonal to each other
individualism vs. altruism
4 groups
altruistic
prosocial
individualistic
competitive
altruism and selfishness
altruism can appear selfish when they are confrontational but
they may be altruistic towards the ingroup but antisocial towars others
may convey or enforce moral values
fusion of self & group prerequisite for self sacrifice
altruism and violence
can involve violence & confrontation
not only about rewarding others
also about punishing others to enforce fairness and prevent free riding
changing the reinforcement matrix —> induce societal change
Last changed3 months ago