Speaking 1. Question
Two reasons
One reason
I personally believe that it is better to [my decision] than [other rason]
First of all, the most evident advantage is ….
For example, I remember when …
Secondly …
For instance, I still recall
In conclusion
The main reason is, …
This is further illustratet by
Moreover
Speaking 2. Question
In this [medium] the university announces that …
The universities first reason for this change is, …
Secondly, the university justifies this measure by stating that, …
The woman, however, is entirely opposed to the change.
The woman is in favor of the change.”
Regarding the first reason, she says
“
Concerning the second reason, she mentions
Speaking 3. Question:
The article discusses the topic of …
It defines [topic] as [definition]
optional: The Author sates that … [one or two information from the article]
The speaker extends the discussion on the topic by giving two [examples/ competing definitions]
The lecturer’s first example/ definition
The lecturer’s second example/ definition
Opt. to fill time at the end: Consequently, based on the information in both passages I now have a better understanding of the topic
Speaking 4. Question:
The professor covers the [topic] in great detail
and defines it as [definition]
The lecturer’s opening example is
The second example given by the Professor is
Option to fill the time at the end: Consequently, based on the information from this lecture I now have a better understanding of the topic
Writing 1. Question
The article discusses [Topic], presenting multiple reasons in support of its position.
This article discusses the question of whether or not [].
The lecturer, however, disputes each of these points, providing counterarguments. The author’s arguments are the following.
Body Paragraph 1:
First of all, [Lect. 1st Counterargument].
The lecturer, however, contradicts this by [briefly author’s 1st argument].
Body Paragraph 2:
Secondly, [Lect. 2nd Counterargument].
The lecturer, on the other hand, opposes this by [briefly author’s 2nd argument].
Body Paragraph 3:
Finally, [briefly author’s 3rd argument].
The lecturer refutes this by[Lect. 3rd Counterargument].
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively challenges the author’s arguments by offering solid counterpoints. This analysis reveals the flaws in the author’s reasoning, ultimately supporting the view that [restate the lecturer’s overall perspective].
Writing 2. Question:
Last changed14 days ago