Symbiose
Zusammenleben von Organismen
Neutrale Interaktionen
Keine wesentliche Effekte
Mutualismus
für beide Beteiligten vorteilhafte Beziehung zwischen zwei Arten
Parasitismus / Antagonismus
für eine oder mehrere Organismen schädliche Beziehung
Beispiele Mutualismus
Mycorrhiza: Pflanzen liefern Pilzpartner mit fotosynthetischen Produkten & Fungi hilft Phosphor aus Boden zu extrahieren
Menschliches Mikrobiom: Grösster Teil im Magen-Darm-Trakt (~ 10 billion mikrobiellen Zellen), die durch die Verdaaung von Ballaststoffen Nährstoffe und Vitamine produzieren
Fluoreszierende bakterien liefern Schutz für Tintenfisch
Mutualismus ist…
Ökologie
Interaktion zwischen Organismen und deren Umwelt
Parasitismus
Beziehung zwischen zwei Arten zum Nutzen der einen Art und zu Lasten der anderen
Mikroorganismen sind Haupttriebkräfte der biochemischen Kreisläufe und sind überall zu finden
Korrelation zwischen Anzahl Organismen und Biomasse
-> Mehr Individueen höhere Biomasse
AUSNAHME: Pflanzen -> können sehr gross sein daher auch grosse Biomasse
Totale Biomasse und largest Biomass
Masse Kohlenstoff (550 billionen Tonnen)
82% Pflanzen
13% Bakterien
5% Andere Organismen (Tiere, Fungi,…)
Terrestrial grösste Biomasse
Welche der Aussagen ist Wahr und welche Falsch
What is life?
Energy conversion
Information storage and replication
Ability to evolve
Earth HIstory and Evolution
Age Earth: 457 billion years
-> planet believed to have formed out of dust particles & hydrogen gas => made up a disk-shaped solar nebula swirling aroung its center (prot-Sun)
-> Eventually formed larger bodies through accretion (collision andmerging)
First life forms:
-> single cells without compartments (-> exlusively prokariotic)
-> during these times all kinds of meatbolic capabilities were evolved to harness energy
-> Oxygenic Photosynthesis led over millions of years to accumulation of =2 in atmosphere => starting revolution in atmospheric chemistry
GREAT OXIDATION EVENT: 2.4 billion years ago
-> completely changed appearance of our planet: Atmospheric O2 reacted to yield ozone shield & oritext surface form radioactive cosmic rays
First Eukaryotic Life forms: ~ 2 billions years ago
Complex multicellular eukaryotes: ~ 0.5 billion years ago (=500 million)
Modern humans: 100’000 years ago
Why Gap between oxigenic photosinthesis and GOE?
Viel O2 im Ozon gelöst
Viel Eisen, welches zuerst oxidiert wurde
Was waren die ersten Lebewesen?
Bakterien und Archae (3.8 b. years ago)
unseen majority => 10^30 -> most numerous organisms
(Viruses outnumber biomass of bacteria BUT are not considere living organisms)
Law of Thermodynamics I:
The total energy in an isolated system remains constant.
-> ex. Physical exercise: chemical energy (food) -> mechanical energy (motion) + heat energy (you feel warmer)
Law of Thermodynamics
System naturally move towards more disorder (higher entropy)
-> ex. tidy room rends to get messy over time
BUT:
unlike isolated system, living organisms stay ordered by taking in energy from their environsment. If they can’t get or use this energy they become disordered and die (ex. plant dies without sunlight)
Energy coupling: Living organisms link energy-release (exergonic) reaction with energy requiring (endergonic) one to maintain oder and stay alive
Exergonic Reactions
Require energy and move towards more order
ex. burning wood: reacts with oxagen releasing energy in form of heat and light
Endorgenic Reactions
Require energy to create order
ex. photosyntehsis: Plants require energy (sunlight) to make glucose and oxygen
Thre domains of Life
All living organisms have one common origin (LUCA), the origina of cellular life
Major inventions in Biology
Origin of Life
Photosynthesis
Eukaryogenisis
Meiosis
Multicellularity
metabolism, RNA, DNA, replication, protein synthesis
Oxygenic -> O2 release as byproduct & anoxygenic
Complex cells
new mechanisms of reproduction; one organism out of two cells
Cellular specialization, new trophic levels in food chain
=> Incomplete understanding of major transisions and key events (like origin of life or genesis of eukariotic cell)
Land plants, animals, humans
Contributers to molecular revolution
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723): Invented microscopes -> “father of microbiology” & observed protists (and bacteria)
Robert Koch (1843-1920): Pure culture of microorganisms
Martinus Beijerinck (1851-1931): Enrichment cultures: Bacteria isolation from (selective) natural samples by manipuating nutrient & incubation conditions
-> revealed the presence of Archaea & Bacteria as distinct beings!
Trees of Life Phylogenetic (universal) Classification
Classification System
First Classification System
Carl Linneaus (1736):
-> 2 Kingdoms (plants and animals
formalised binomial nomenclature (still used)
believed that living beings were unchangeable => NO EVOLUTION
Charles Darwim (Origin of Life) & Alfred Wallace (Theory of evolution by natural selection (1858):
-> Evolutionary Theory with Means of natural selection
*Major drivers of evolution
Mutation
Horizontal gene transfer / recombination (meiosis)
=> genetic variation
Natural selection (treibende Kraft, nicht zufällig)
Genetic (*bottle necks) drift (random loss of sequence)
=> sorting genetic variation
Darwin
Descent with modification
common descent
graduation
multiplication of species
natural Selection
Complications to Woese
Genome is structured like mosaic: Bacteria and Archaea frequently exhange genes in process called horizontal gene transer!
Eukarya are more closely related to Archaea but also clearly related to Bacteria: Eukarya are chimeric (= composed of 2 different organisms)
Currently accepted classification System
Woes tree (1990):
3 domains (bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya)
Logic: Assumption that mutations rate is constant, so divergence between sequences of shared gene in vairous can be used as molecular clock.
ex. more differences in rRNA sequences -> diverged longer ago
Woese used genetic sequences of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) as phylogenetic marker to reconstruct molecular tree of life
-> Why rRNA?:
existed in LUCA -> univerally distributed
fulfill essential functions -> highly conserved
Lynn Margulis
Endosymbiotic origin of eukaryotes (1967)
-> (1) mitochondria descend from aerobic respiring bacteri which were incorporated into an archaeon
-> (2) Chloroplast are result of incorporation of canobacterium into eucaryotic cell
! Endosymbiosis solves contradictions how enkaryotes are of chimeric nature (with different genes most closely related to either bacteria or archaea) but still have monophyletic (one common ancestor and all descendent) origin. !
Konstantin Mereschkowski
Theory of Symbiogenesis (1910)
=> Eukaryotic cell result of sybmbiotic relationships
Dry Weight of E. coli
80% Water
20% Dry Weight
55% Protein
20% RNA
9% Lipids
Origins Of Life (Louis Pasteur)
Before was thought tha life arrives from non-living matter
SWAN-FLASK-EXPERIMENT:
Swan-flask filled with broth (nonsterile)
sterilzed with heat
waited to cool down
a) shape of flask allows air to enter but NO DUST AND MICROORGANISM:
=> no formation of bacteria; Liquid remains sterile
b) Flask is gently tipped
=> Liquid produes smell / different color
=> ALL LIFE IS FROM LIFE!
Additions:
Sterilization by heat (Pasteurisation)
Discovery that living beings could discrimination between optical isomeres => Importance of molecular shapes ind biological interactions
Discovery that fermentation was a biological (not just chemical) process
Development of vaccines for anthrax, cholera and rabies
-> Discovery of when germs (bacteria, viruses) were weakened before injected into animals they would get sick but not die. When again infected with strong germs they stayed healthy!
=>DESIGN VACCINES BY WEAKENING GERMS IN LAB
Normal Replication (Slow Growth)
Start: One DNA molecule
DNA Replciation starts: cell begins to copy DNA at origin
DNA Replication ends: cells ends copying DNA before it divides
Cell Division: One DNA copy goes into each daughter cell
Results: 1 DNA molecule in cell
Fast Replication (Rapid Growth Conditions)
DNA Replication begins: cell begins to copy DNA at origin
Before finishing first copy: cell starts again to copy DNA at the same origin
two replication forks at the same time
-> one still finishing one copy
-> the other starting a new copy
Results:
2 DNA molecules per cell (one nearly finished; the other starting)
=> FASTER
Essential conditions for emergence of Life
Phyisical compartmentation: Barriers separating environsments with different levels of entropy
ex. Membranes
Source of Energy: preventing thermodynic equilibrium (Equilibrium = death) -> source of energy to drive reactions
ex. lightning/volcaninc heat (like Miller-Urey-Experimetn) or Hydrothermal vents (alkaline vents like “lost city”)
Antibiotic polymerisation of monomeric units: Building block (amino acids, nucleotides) must link into chains (Proteins, RNA)
ex. Hydrothermal vents: Heat and pressure promote polymerization (e.g., fatty acids → membranes)
Cazalyzers: promotisch abiotic synthessi of small organic molecules (speed up process without enzymes)
ZnS (zincsulfide): helps form sugar from formaldehyde under UV-light
Accumulation of organic molecules (high concentration) to establish metabolic networks (enabling reactions)
ex. Hydrothermal Vents: Tiny pores in vent minerals trap and concentrate organics, allowing polymers to form and interact.
Continues disposal of waste by-products, for pre-biotoic (=before emergence of life) system to not reach equilibrium
ex. Geothermal Cycling: Heat breaks down waste polymeres, freeing monomeres for reuse
How Life could have emerged
Phase 1 (molecule Formation)
Volcanic gases (CO2, H2, NH3) react in icy meltwater, forming amino acids an nucleotides
UV light and metal ions drive further synthesis
Phase 2 (Polymerization & Compartmentation)
Freze-thaw cycles concetrate and polymerize molecules into RNA and peptides
Lipid membranes form around these polymers, creating protocells
Pahse 3 (metabolic Network)
RNA strands begin selp-replciating inside protocells
SImple petide enyzmes assist in energy harvestint (e.g.m proton gradients)
Phase 4 (Early Life)
Protocell with self-replicating RNA and peptide catalysts becomes the first “living” system
Natural selection favors more efficient replicators
=> Metabolism-First and RNA-World Hypothesis
Approaches
Bottom up: Studying geochemical processes and deriving scenarios contributing to the formation of more and more comples systems
ex. “lost city” -> begins abiotic geology/chemistry and builds towards biology
Top down: comparing todays diversity and trying to find their common roots
ex. LUCA -> begins with existing life and traces back to minimal ancestors
Bottom-Up
Top-Down
Asks: How could life arise from non-life?
Asks: What did the first life look like?
Strengths: Tests abiotic-to-biotic transitions.
Strengths: Grounded in biological evidence.
Limitation: Hard to confirm prebiotic conditions.
Limitation: LUCA was already complex.
Primordial soup (Hypothesis late 1920s)
inorganic molecules in anoxic atmosphere (CO2, NH3, H2,…)
reacted with each other (by slow process of molecule evolution)
created more and more complex organic molecules which accumulated in the primitive oceans
Miller Urey Experiment
simulation of natural lightnigh in reducing atmosphere (CH4, NH3, H2, H2O) transformed to organic molecules like amino acids
-> Confirming “Primordial Soup” Hypothesis
PROBLEMS:
Earth’s atmosphere less reducing and contain different mixture of gases (CO2, N2, H2o and only traces of H2) than used in experiment
Amino acids formed were 50/50 left- and right-handed molecules, living beings all live on homochiral molecules (exclusively left-handed aminos acids)
Electric lightnigh can’t serve as source of energy to keep pre-biotic system far from thermodynamic equilibrium
RNA World
Hypothesis where pre-biotic chemistry already produced large amounts of organic molecules which had starte to form more complex structures (like polymeres)
First form of pre-biotoic self-replicating structure composed of auto-catalytic RNA molecules
able to store information
able to catalyze checmical reactions (like their own synthesis)
-> Proteins eventually replaced RNA as catalysts
-> DNA became genome and template
Viruses may have evolved from RNA genome-like structure
Key Evidence:
Ribozymes: RNA molecules that can catalyze reactions
RNA’s Dual Role: RNA can do both, store information and perform catalysis
Prebiotic Chemistry: RNA nucleotides can form under plausible early Earth conditions (though controversial)
Challenges:
Prebiotic Synthesis: RNA is complex and unstable -> how could have formed spontaniously
Limited Catalytic Range: Rybozymes (RNA enzymes) are less versatile than protein enzymes -> how could have supported a full metabolic network
Error-Prone Replication: Early RNA replication would have been inneficient -> high mutation rates and potential collapse of genetic information
!WHERE DID RNA COME FROM?
Metabolism First Hypothesis
metabolic networks (self-sustaining chemical cycles) emerged before genetic replication => Life began with autocalytic cycles that could grow and evolve
IRON SULFUR WORLD HYPOTHESIS (at black smokers)
life began with autocatalytic metabolic cycles on mineral surfaces
-> Iron sulfide (FeS) reacts with CO producing organic molecules and releasing (small amounts) of free energy (that theoretically could promote further biochemical reactions (=early form of metabolism)
PROS:
long lasting steady flow of energy
because of the chimney like structure of the vents, the organic molecules produced can accumulate locally (and do not have to fill up the entire ocean as assumed by primordial soup hypothesis)
Water coming out of the black smokers reaches temperature of 300°C -> would destroy organic molecules
IRON SULFUR WORLD HYPOTHESIS (at white smokers)
(compatible with Top-Down Approach, siehe unten)
Alkaline Vents (ex. “lost city”) have
-> moderate temperatures (70-90°) ideal for organic molecule stability
-> Due to serpentinization (=> sea water reacts with mineral olvine (contained in Earthcrust) formating serpentine and H2) => High pH (9-11)
Natural Proton Gradient: Minerals in white smokers form compartments due to the amotsphere rich in CO2(which partially dissolved in oceans and acidifieds it) leading to compartments with different concentrations
Vent fluid: pH 9-11 (highly alkaline, low H+ concentration)
Seawater: pH ~6 (more acidic, higher H+ concentration)
-> difference creates a proton gradient
=> natural protonmotive force (same force that drives ATP Syntehsis!)
-> inorganic compartments = precursos of cell walls & membranes found in free-living prokaryotes
Iron-sulfur minerals at surface of bubbles have catalytic properties & can convert H2 and CO2 to simple organic molecules like methane or acetate.
Connection to Top-Down Approach:
LUCA as anaerobic and thermophilic organism that inhabitated a geochemically-active environment
LUCA’s Biochemistry: replete with FeS.clusters (transition metal enzymes) that enabnle to live of H2 and fix CO2 and N2
Prokaryotic groups identified at base of tree of life (phylogenetic analysis)
methanogenic Archaea
acetogenic Bacteria
Feature
Alkaline Vent Hypothesis
Classic Iron-Sulfur World
Environment
Serpentinizing vents (pH ~11)
Acidic vents (pH ~3–6)
Energy Source
H₂ + pH gradient
FeS → FeS₂ redox
Key Molecules
H₂, CH₄, formate
CO, H₂S, Fe(CO)₅
Link to Life
Direct proton gradients → ATP analogs
Surface metabolism → peptides
CHALANGES:
Link to genetics: doesn’t explain how heredity (e.g. RNA/DNA) emerged from puerly metabolic systems
Limited Evolvability: Experiments show that purely metabolic networks struggle to undergo evolution
Some reactions (e.g. peptide formation) occur at very low efficiencies
Open Questions how LIfe emerged?
Did life start with genetic(RNA) or chemistry (metabolism)?
Could a “messy” mixture of molcules lead to life, rather than a pure RNA or metabolic system?
How did the genetic code emerged from either Scenario?
Last changed3 days ago