Reasons for AuM growth in the 1980s
disintermediation & securitization (change in the banking industry)
institutional investors started to outsource part of there asset management to external investors in segregated accounts
rising assets prices due to inflation, falling interest rates & rising income share of capital ownwers
-> strong growth of AuM
Positive factors for growth of fund management industry in Germany
high per capita income
high savings-rate -> capital accumulation
Negative factors inhibit growth of fund management in GER
very conservative private & institutional investment policies
very small funded pension system (direct pension paid by Government)
Behavior institutional investors 70s - 90s (old institutional world)
performance was easy to achieve by rf fixed income investments (-> no strategic factor)
No systematic asset liability process
no existence of Investment Consultants
Asset Management manadates were awarded based on friendship
Asset Management service was offeres as “one stop shopping” by one bank -> low cost transparency & suboptimal combination of service providers
Low market share of foreign asset managers (especially institutional)
Behavior institutional investors 90s onwards (new institutional world)
necessary asset performance hard to achieve -> key competition factor
Important to find the optimal asset allocation (ALM-studies) -> to conservative die slowly, to aggressive die quickly
Start of Investment consulting industry
asset management mandates are awarded as result of rigorous selection process
debundling of service package around asset management -> more cost transparency & optimal combination of service providers
German market opened for foreign asset managers
-> “Zero Sum Game” view of the world
Mutual fund
single pool for many investors -> each investor receive units in proportion to its contribution
Segregated Accounts (Spezialisten fond)
bespoke single-client mandate for major investors -> managed seperately & tailored investment strategy
Last changed3 days ago