Applying utilitarianism
determine alternative actions
Estimate benefits and costs
Subtract cost from benefit
Choose action with biggest net utility
Criticism of Utilitarianism
Comparative value (exam prep good or bad)
Measurability (human life)
Unreliable cost/benefit (two week holiday)
What counts as cost/benefit (going to church)
Monetary equivalent (death)
Difference between moral and legal rights
Legal right = a person can act and others must respect according to legal system
Moral right = a right that exists everywhere just for being human
Types of moral rights
Negative rights = leave us alone (privacy)
Positive rights = Help us (right to food)
Contractual = keep agreement
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
First Formulation: Universalizability (What if everyone did this?)
Second Formulation: Humanity/Dignity
Third Formulation: Honor Contracts
Three defensible moral rights
humans should have basic amenities (positive rights)
Being free to think and free of injury (negative right)
Preserve and honor contracts (contractual right)
categorical imperative explains why but not which ones but these are defendable
Types of justice
Distributive Justice (distribute benefits/burden)
Retributive Justice (impose punishment)
Compensatory justice (compensation for wrongs)
Models of distribution
Egalitarianism (pol and Econ equality)
Capitalism (based on value of contribution)
Socialism ( based on need and ability)
Libertarianism ( based on free choices)
Rawls principles of justice and why they’re good
equal liberty
A) difference (greatest benefit to least advantaged)
B) Equal opportunity
1>2 and 2b>2a
Equal liberty - freedom to pursue interest
Difference- protection against ending in worst position (veil of ignorance!!!!)
Equal opportunity - everyone wants their talent protected
Last changed18 days ago