Structure of a valuation report
Executive summary
Preamble
Description of the property
Market analysis
Valuation
Conclusions
Appendices & annexes
Preamble - Content
Identification of the subject property
Purpose of the valuation
Bases of the value
Valuation date
Description of the Property - Elements to be analyzed
Location
Technical description (physical characteristics & quality assessment)
Dimension
Rental status
Land registry
Building and zoning compliance
Presence of restrictions
Peculiarities of the property market
Delay in the availability of data
Lack of transparency
Quality of information varies depending on the market cycle (volume before value)
Values are less reactive to market conditions
Market analysis - Comparative factors
Reliability
Recentness
Uniformity
Specificity
Market anaylsis - types of information sources
Direct sources
Indirect sources
OLD classification of appraisal methodologies
Market approach
Cost approach
Income approach
Issues with the old methodology
Depreciated cost approach does not provide a market value
Market approach & Income approach are both based on comparative data
NEW classification of appraisal methodologies
Sales comparison methodologies
Direct comparison approach
Hedonic pricing model
Multipliers & Rule of thumb
Income capitalisation comparison methodologies
Direct capitalisation approach
Discounting cash flow approach
Sales comparison methodology - Principles
Substitution principle
Equilibrium principle
Direct comparison approach - steps
Selecting the comparables
Standardising the transaction price of the comparables
Estimating adjustments
Direct comparison approach - comparability features
Physical features
Regulatory use
Economic and financial characteristics
When is the direct comparison approach appropriate?
Standard properties: Investment market with owners and users exists
Uniform properties
Frequent transactions
Depreciated cost methodologies - principle
-> Gives a maximum price
Depreciated cost methologies - calculation
+ Cost of construction (including cost of capital)
- Depreciation of the building
+ Cost of the land
Limitations of the depreciated cost methodologies
Difficult to determine the value of land
Depreciation is difficult to determine, as it needs to be the “loss resulting from the obsolescence of the building and its physical deterioration”
What does the depreciated cost methodology allow to estimate?
Insurance value of a building
Market value: Only in a few selected cases
When is the depreciated cost methodology meaningless?
There is a market of owners/users -> Sales comparison method
There is a market of space -> Income capitalisation method
There are no comparable transactions/information of rent (could mean that there is no market at all)
Direct capitalisation approach - what adjustments need to be made to calculate a normalised periodic income?
Average for extraordinary maintenance
Check sustainability of current rents
NOI - possible time horizons
Historical or current values
Potential values
Market values (when the other two options are not viable)
Cap rate estimation - features that should be similar
HBU
Age/quality of the building
Building conditions (CAPEX)
Economic and legal condition (lease agreement)
Cap rate vs. Discount rate: Extraction from the market
Cap rate: Directly extracting from the market
Discount rate: Not directly applicable
Cap rate vs. Discount rate: Determining from Cap Rate
Cap rate: -
Discount rate: Based on relationship between IRR and income yield
Cap rate vs. Discount rate: Build-up approach
Cap rate: Can be used
Discount rate: Expresses the discount rate as a function of the specific risk components
Cap rate vs. Discount rate: Experts´ opinion
Cap rate: Based on the opinion of operators
Discount rate: Useful as a benchmark
What valuation methodolody?
Residential
Flexible
Non-flexible
Trade-related
Land
Residential: Sales comparison methods
User = Owner
High number of transactions
Relatively uniform properties
Flexible commercial: Income Cap Methods
Non-flexible commercial: Depreciated costs OR based on rent that could be earned during the current users´ period
Trade-related commercial: Income Cap Method
Land:
Comparables: Sales comparison
No comparables: Multiple periods residual value
When is the direct comparison approach acceptable for trade-related properties?
When comparable standard companies, such as hotels in medium/large cities, are being looked at
-> e.g., Value per room (NOT value per sqm)
Market value: “Highest and Best Use (HBU)” - elements
Technically achievable
Financially sustainable
Legally permitted
Highest profitability
-> Allows the value to be maximized by a typical market player
Zuletzt geändertvor 2 Jahren