Describe the approach.
Compare current and previous creatinine levels to determine if the process is acute.
Check diagnostic criteria and perform staging of AKI.
Determine the most likely mechanism of AKI (i.e., prerenal, intrinsic, or postrenal) based on:
A comprehensive chart review, history, and physical examination
Supportive diagnostic findings and response to initial interventions
Consider further testing for specific underlying causes of AKI.
In the absence of previously documented creatinine levels, stable creatinine levels with findings such as chronic anemia and small hyperechoic kidneys on ultrasound suggest CKD rather than AKI.
Clinical presentation, laboratory tests, imaging, response to initial therapy, and, in some cases, histopathology are required to determine the underlying cause of AKI.
List diagnostic criteria of acute kidney injury.
Acute kidney injury is defined as the presence of any of the following criteria: [7]
Increase in serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (26.5 μmol/L) within 48 hours.
Increase in serum creatinine to ≥ 1.5 times baseline level within 7 days.
Decrease in urine output to < 0.5 mL/kg/hour for ≥ 6 hours.
Describe the staging of AKI.
The KDIGO stages are widely used and correlate with the risk of death, need for renal replacement therapy, and long-term outcomes (e.g., CKD).
Other classifications include: [7]
RIFLE criteria: A classification system for acute kidney injury
The acronym stands for Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage kidney disease.
For the first three categories, patients are classified according to the level of kidney injury (i.e., degree of increase in serum creatinine and/or decrease in GFR and urine output) and for the last two categories, according to the duration of complete loss of kidney function.
Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria
KDIGO staging.
Overview diagnostic findings.
Describe diagnostic findings of prerenal AKI.
Blood study findings
Elevated serum creatinine
Serum BUN:creatinine ratio ≥ 20:1
Urine study findings
Normal urinalysis
Low urinary sodium and urea excretion
Low fractional excretion of sodium (FENa < 1%)
Low fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea < 35%)
High urine osmolality (> 500 mOsm/kg) and specific gravity (> 1.020)
Urine sediment: hyaline casts due to concentrated urine in the setting of low renal perfusion
Clinical findings: rapid improvement in renal function following acute intervention
Patients with prerenal AKI receiving diuretic therapy may have a falsely elevated FENa. Therefore, FEUrea may be more informative in this setting.
Describe diagnostic findings of intrinsic AKI.
Elevated serum creatinine concentration and rapidly rising serum creatinine level
BUN:creatinine ratio ≤ 15:1
High urinary sodium and urea excretion
High urine sodium concentration (> 40 mEq/L)
High fractional excretion of sodium (FENa > 2–3%) [8][15]
High fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea > 50%) [15]
Low urine osmolality (< 350 mOsm/kg)
Urine sediment: renal tubular epithelial cells or granular, muddy brown, or pigmented casts
Biopsy: e.g., in suspected rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis
Clinical findings: lack of response to acute intervention
A falsely low FENa may be seen in some patients with intrinsic AKI, e.g., due to glomerulonephritis, acute interstitial nephritis, rhabdomyolysis, or contrast-induced nephropathy.
Describe diagnostic findings of postrenal AKI.
Elevated serum creatinine concentration in bilateral obstruction
BUN:creatinine ratio varies; usually normal (i.e., 10:1–20:1)
Normal urinalysis: e.g., when due to neurogenic bladder
Hematuria: e.g., when due to stones, bladder cancer, clots
Urine osmolality varies.
Imaging (renal ultrasound or noncontrast CT scan)
Bladder distention, high postvoid residual volume, bilateral hydronephrosis, and/or obstructing stones
See “Imaging modalities” in “Urinary tract obstruction.”
Clinical findings: rapid improvement in renal function following resolution of the obstruction
List imaging modalities and their respective findings.
Imaging
Imaging of the kidneys and urinary tract is not necessary to establish a diagnosis of AKI but may be needed to determine the etiology.
Ultrasound
Obtain urgently to assess for hydronephrosis in patients with risk factors for urinary tract obstruction.Consider when evaluating renal dysfunction of unclear etiology.
Noncontrast CT
Obtain if ultrasound shows hydronephrosis but does not reveal the cause of the obstruction.
Consider when clinical suspicion of obstruction remains high despite the absence of hydronephrosis on ultrasound.
See also “Imaging modalities” in “Urinary tract obstruction.”
Obtain an urgent ultrasound to rule out hydronephrosis in patients with risk factors for urinary tract obstruction.
While ultrasound is the initial test of choice to assess for urinary tract obstruction, CT has greater sensitivity for detecting obstructions and stones.
Describe the renal biopsy.
Not routinely indicated
Consider if:
The cause of AKI cannot be identified after a thorough initial evaluation
Diagnostic confirmation of the cause (e.g., glomerulonephritis, myeloma nephropathy) is needed prior to initiating disease-specific therapy
Zuletzt geändertvor 2 Jahren