What is the difference between internal and external (language) history?
External history: political/social/cultural history of the people who speak a language insofar that it is relevant for linguistic development (happening to the people who speak the language rather than the language itself)
French loanwords that entered Middle English after the Norman Conquest 1066
Development and disappearance of two second person pronouns between the 13th and the 17th century (thou/ you)
Normans brought French system of distinction to England, then it disappeared in the 17th century as the middle class started to rise
Internal History: development over time irrespective of its external history (not influenced by external history)
Development of do-support in negated and interrogative senteces between 1500 and 1700
“he knows not” -> “he does not know”
“Knows she?” -> “Does she know?”
-> Would’ve happened regardless of conquests etc.
-> Not possible to draw clear line
Periodisation of English: How are the different “stages” of English subdivided and which historical events coincide with them?
Late 4th century
History: Migration of Germanic tribes to Britain
Language: OE
Late 6th century
History: Christianisation -> literacy -> OE documented in writing
1066
History: Norman Conquest
Language: Start of ME (historically)
1154
History: Last entry Anglosaxon Chronicles
Language: End of OE, start of ME
1476
History: Introduction of printing press in England (William Caton) -> technology leads to change of language (more readily available to everyone) -> end of ME
Language: End of ME
1485
History: Fist tudor king (Henry VII) -> political stability
Language: Early Modern English/ME
1492
History: Columbus invades America, language brought to/imposed on new places
1525
History: Tyndales translation of new testament, reformation -> influence of Christian history on ME
Language:
1660
History: End of civil war, restoration
Language: Division of early and later modern English
Development of English language
Prehistoric old English
OE: 400/700-1150
ME: 1150 - 1500
Early Modern English: 1500 - 1700
Modern English: 1700 - ?
What are language families?
A group of languages deriving from a single ancestor or parent
How many languages and language families exist?
7139 known languages deriving from 142 families
What are the most common language families by numbers of languages and by numbers of speakers?
Language families by language count
Niger-Congo: 1535
Austronesian: 1225
Other: 2631
Language families by speaker population 2021
Indo-European: 3.29 B
Sino-Tibetan: 1.4 B
Niger-Congo: 571 M
Which Indo-European language families exist and which non-IE languages are spoken in Europe?
Most languages spoken in Europe branches of IE-family
Germanic: German, English, Dutch, Danish
Italic: Italian, Spanish, French, Portuguese
Slavic: Czech, Polish, Russian, Bulgarian
Celtic: Welsh, Irish Gaelic, Scots Gaelic
Non-IE languages spoken in Europe
Finnish
Hungarian
Turkish
What does the family tree of the Indo-European language look like?
Italic
Latin
Italian
French
Spanish
Romanian
Romansch
Catalan
Germanic
West Germanic
Low Saxon
Flemish
Dutch
Afrikaans
Low German
Frisan
High German
Yiddish
Old English
English
Scots
East Germanic
Gothic (dead)
North Germanic
Old Norse
West
Icelandic
Farose
Norwegian
East
Danish
Swedish
Celtic
Goidelic
Irish Gaelic
Scotish Gaelic
Brythonic
Cornish
Breton
Welsh
Hellenic
Ancient Greek (dead)
Modern Greek
Tocharian (dead)
Anatolian (dead)
What happened in England befor the introduction of Indo-European in regards to history?
700’000 years ago: first settlements in Britain
Homo erectus
Homo Heidelbergensis
Homo neandertahlensis
Last glacial period: arrival of homo sapiens sapiens (modern man)
10’000 BC: Ice retreats -> settlement expands north and west
6’000 BC and after: land bridges flooded (glaciers melt, connection between Britain and rest of europe disappears)
3’000 BC: spread of agriculture
Stone hedge and circles
2’000 BC: Bronze age begins (bronze, copper, gold)
Trad + agriculture = population growth
What language was spoken in Britain before Indo-European?
Little known about language and ethnicity of those people
Medieval speculations: giants
Modern Speculation:
Iberian people
Basque people
Semitic people
Unlikely that those people became extinct -> presence should still be felt in British language
What is the history of Britain after the introduction of IE until OE like? Who were the Celts?
Celts: diverse group of tribes
Early Iron age: development of proto-celtic culture in Central Europe
800-300 BC: Celtic Expansion (Galicia, Gallia, Galatina)
Development of various celtic dialects
Continental dialect (now extinct)
Insular dialects (attested from about 400 AD in inscriptions)
55 BC: Punitive/reconnaissance expedition by Ceasar
By this time many celtic kingdoms, some with ties to Belgic people, which was used as an excuse by Cesar to invade
54 BC: Cesar wins war against Catuvellani and south-east of Britain
Annual tribute demanded
43 AD: Full scale invasion by Claudius
Romans landed in Kent and defeated Brits
Roman army divided to go on several campaigns
Forts built to control key points
51 AD: Wales conquered
80 AD: zenith of Roman power in Britain, rule extended to Caledonia
122 AD: emperopr Hadrian arrives in Britain, orders wall to be built north of the Stanegate -> dividing conquered places and places that are not yet “civilized”
Hadrian Wall
Late 130s
Souther Scotland reoccupied
Construction of new wall under emperor Antonious -> Antonine Wall (142 AD)
163 AD: Antonine Wall abandoned in favour of Hadrians frontier
Last decade of the 4th century: legions leave to fight civil wars of Empire
408: remainder of Roman garrison crosses to Gaul
410: Emperor Honorius writes to cities of Britain to look to their own defence
What was (life in) Britain in the last decades of teh 4th century AD like?
Britain divided into four provinces
Britania prima
Capital: Cirencester
Britania secunda
Capital: York
Flavia Caesariensis
Capital: Lincoln
Maxima Caesariensis
Capital: London
Life under Roman rule
Coloniae: communities of Roman citizens centered around fortresses
Civitaes: areas of self-government based on old late Iron age tribal areas with old towns and centers
What happened to the place names during the Roman Empire/conquest?
Latin toponymic elements: -caster, cester, -chester
From latin “castrum, -a” = a militay camp, fortified town
Things specific to region + Latin component = new name
Examples
Kornion (L) -> Ciernceaster -> Cirencester
Mamucion (L) -> Mameceaster -> Manchester
What languages were spoken in Roman Britain?
Various dialects of Celts by natives
Lation (+ other celtic and Germanic languages) by Roman colonizers
Bilingualism amongst romanised Celts (= Language contact situation)
What is the difference between a substrate and a superstrate language?
Substrate language: native language
Superstrate language: Language of colonizer/ colonial language
What parts of the Celtic language stayed in terms of topographical elements?
Names of waterplaces tend to stay the same regardless of migration, colonization etc.
City names etc. tend to change based on migration, colonization etc.
-> Same thing happened with Britain/Celts
Some examples:
Carr = rock
Combe = Valles
Crag = Steep, rugged rock
Avon < abona (river)
Axe = esca = Water
Thames = dark river (tamar, Tame, Thame)
Where is Celtic spoken today?
British Isles
Ireland
Scotland
Wales
Cornwall
Isle of Man
Brittany
Cape Breton Island (Canada)
Patagonia (Argentina)
What different kinds of Celtic languages (still) exist?
Goidelic/ Gaelic = Q-celtic (*kw became *k)
Scots Gaelic
Manx (dead)
Cape Breton Gaelic (Canada)
Brythonic - British = P-Celtic (*kw became *p)
What can be said about Irish Gaelic?
Spoken natively only along western Cosat of Ireland (Gaeltacht, ca. 3% of population)
National laguage (co-official with English) of Republic of Ireland
in 2007, 357’000 (7.8% of total population) considered themselves fluent in Irish
What can be said about Scotish Gaelic?
60’000 native speakers (1.2% of population), mostly in Hebrides
Not official language in UK
What can be said about Manx?
Spoken on Isle of Man (well, not anymore)
Last native speaker died in 1974
What can be said about Cornish?
Spoken in Cornwall
Last known fluent speaker died in 1777
What can be said about Welsh?
Spoken in Wales
Official language of Wales
Surviving celtic language with most speakers
611’000 speakers (21.7% of population of Wales, half of them considering themselves fluent)
What can be said about Breton?
Spoken in Brittany (France) (From Southern England around 5th century)
206 active speakers (less than 5% of population, 61% of those 60+ years old)
What can be said about Cape Breton Gaelic?
Spoken in Nova Soctia, Canada (Mainly Cape Breton Island)
Community of about 2000 speakers
What can be said about the Oldenglish Alphabe?
Originally runic Alphabet/furhorc
597 AD Christianisation of Britain (Augustines mission)
Roman alphabet lacked some letters for sounds of Oldenglish
no w -> aopted runic letter wynn (looks like a p)
no th sound
Adopted runic thorn (p with longer line on top)
later introduction of second letter for th sound -> eth (looks a bit like a d) (not originally from runic alphabet)
Two lower vowels (/a/ and /ae/) both represented in runes (/ae/ = ash)
Yogh = looks like a g
What are some general principles of Old English pronounciation?
OE spelling much more phonetic than ME spelling
Close to one letter = one sound ideal
Every written letter is pronounced, no silent sound
i.e. kn = k n, not “n”
Double consonants are pronunced longer
biddan -> bid-dan
Vowel lentght distinctive in OE, since different length = different meaning
What are the rules regarding where stress is placed on a word/sentence in Old English?
Stress generally on first syllable
1st syllable typically root of word
In compounds, the first element is stressed, second element recives secondary stress
Prefixes are generally stressed
Exception
ge- and be- prefix NEVER stressed
For- prefix rarely stressed
In verbs, the rootverb is stressed, not the prefix
How many vowels are there in Old English?
7 letters (a, æ, e, i, o, u, y), 14 sounds (long, short)
/i/, /i:/, /y:/ /y/ /e/ /e:/ /ae/ /ae:/ /u:/ /u/ /o:/ /o/ /a:/ /a/
Y kind of like a long/short ü
How is cg pronounced in Old English?
like [dʒ] as in jungle
Spelling does not determine voiced/voiceless sound
How does an n sound in an Old English written word (2 options)?
[n] as in sin
[ŋ] (singer, finger)
Before velar sounds [g, k]
How would you pronounce a f/v in Old English? (More than one option)
voiceless/voiced distinction
Voiceless [f]
At the beginning of a word
At the end of a word
When doubled
before silent c
example: finger, wife
Voiced [v]
Between voiced sounds
Example: wives, love
How would you pronounce a s/z in Old English? (More than one option)
Voiceless [s]
example: cost, sin, house
Voiced [z]
Example: rise, houses
How would you pronounce a voiceless/voiced th in Old English? (More than one option)
Voiceless [Þ]
example: tooth, thigh, south
Voiced [ð]
Example: feather
How would you pronounce a written g in Old English? (More than one option)
[g]
Next to backvowels (a, o, u)
Before other consonants
[ɣ]
Between backvowels
Between [l, r] and backvowels
Final after backvowels
[j]
Next to front vowels/diphtongs
yard, year
How would you pronounce a written k in Old English? (More than one option)
[k] (like cat, car)
Next to backvowels [a, o, u]
[[tʃ] (like cheese, chicken)
Next to frontvowels [i, e, y]
How would you pronounce a written h in Old English? (More than one option)
[h] (voiceless)
At the beginning of syllables
as in “hot”
[x]
Afer backvowels [e, o, u]
As in “ach”
[ç]
After frontvowels [i, e, y]
As in “ich”
What sources exist regarding the Anglo Saxon migration of 450 AD?
Placenames
Archeological evidence of settlements and cemeteries
Genetic sources
Written sources
Gildas, De excidio et conquest Brianniae (c.540)
Bede
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
When and how did the Germanic tribes arrive to Britain?
Romans had relocated between 380 and 408
Some roman structures still around, but many cities abandoned, trade mevoed
Some religious structures of the Romans (Christianity) remaind
in 433, Britons asked Romans for help, but they were busy fighting Attila
Britons asked Angles for help
Which Germanic tribes arrived to Britain?
From the Jutes (Norwegians) came…
The Cantware (inhabitants of Kents)
Withware (Isle of Wright)
From the Old Saxons came…
South- and West-Saxons
From the Angles (Denmark) came…
East and Middle Angles
Mercians
Northumbrians
New settlers of Britain
Saxons
Angles
Jutes
Danes
Frisians
Franks
others
Which waves of migrations followed the withdrawal of the Romans in Britain?
Late 4th century: early settlers
450: Peak Migration intensified after final departure of Romans and reached (Hengest & Horsa event)
470-490: More settlers to south and south-east
500: Britions reunited under Abrosius Aurelanius, fight and defeat Saxons at Mount Badon c. 500
Migration goes down for a while, back up in 550
550: new wave of migration
Which seven Anglo-Saxon kingdoms existed after the withdrawal of the Romans and the Germanic migration?
Anglian Kingdom
Northumbria
Mercia
East Anglia
Saxon Kingdom
Wessex
Essex
Sussex
Jutish Kingdom
Kent
What is Sutton Hoo? Why is it significant?
Excavation place (remains of whole burial ship)
documents settlement history of Anglosaxons
Sometimes burials (and the change of burials) is a clear indicator that population has changed
Leftovers allow reconstruction of how things looked/were build
What is Staffordschire hoard?
Excavation place discovered in 2009
Gold and jewlery was probably hidden during Viking invasion
How did the Christianisation of Britain happen after the migration of the Germanic tribes?
Romans
597: Mission of St. Augustine
Converted kings of
Northubria
-> Essential to first convert aristocrats to have a chance at converting wider society
Foundation of Archbishopric of Canterbury and York
Country was almost pagan at this point
Wanted to make London the center of Christianity but failed, so it became Kent
Members of first mission (Augustine) directly involved in conversion of English (mainly kentish) people
Preaching at the courts of kings and aristocracy
Setting up dioceses
Founding monasteries, building churches
Estabilishing schools -> vernacular writing
669: Consecration of Theodore as archbishop of Canterbury
Brought a lot of books and scholars with him -> Latin was spoken fluently for a few decades after his arrival in Kent
Wanted to strengthen school in Kent
Irish
563: Irishman Columba founded Scottish School of Iona
King Oswals of Northumbria converted while in exile among Scots
Late 6th-7th century: Mission of the Scottish church of Iona
Christianization of Northumbrians
635: Foundation of Lindisfarne monastery by Aidan
Aidan and Irish followers and their pupils re-estabilished Christianity in
Introduced it ino Mercia
Gallic
Mission from paris basin, Burgundy & northern Italy
Locals
Important Monasteries in Northumbria
Lindisfarne
Jarrow
663 Synod of Whitby
Romans and Irish had different ideas about Christianity
Romans won -> Irish church becomes part of Roman church
What happened during the first Viking Age in Britain? Name the most important dates
787: Three ships of raiders arrive at Portland (Wessex)
793: Sak of Lindisfarne (easy target because monastery)
830-840: attack on…
850-860: Viking beginn to stay in Britain over winter
Bring women, peasants etc. -> settlement
860-870: Vikin raids on
878: battle of Edington (King Alfred vs. Guthrum) -> kind of succesful, Country divided into English law and Danelaw
879/80: settlement of East Anglia
Danelaw vs. English Law: country divided
What happened during the second Viking Age in Britain?
After estabilishing Danelaw some peace for a while, English even manage to reconquest some spaces from Vikings
910-920: West-Saxon reconquest under Edard the Elder
919-950: Danish kingdom of York
980: renewal of Viking raids on England
991: Vikings attack
defeat English at Maldon
paid 10’000 pounds of tribute by Aethelred the unready
997-1002: annual raids continue
1016-35: King Cnut, manages to incorporate into one big country
England
Denmark
Norway
Southern Sweden
-> does not last long, 1040 English kings reestabilished
1066: Norman conquest
What are some examples of the linguistic influence of the Vikings on place names?
“-by” suffix = “farmstead, village” -> Begby, Bellerby
“-thorp” suffix = “secondary settlement” -> Carthorpe, Towthorpe
“-toft” suffix = “site of a house, homestead” (Lowestoft)
Hybrids: Grimston (Scandinavian Grims + OE tun)
What does the Old English lexicon consist off and how does it differ from the PDE lexicon?
Native word-stock & borrowings from other languages
OE-word stock mainly native
Most new words created from native resources (i.e. compounds and the like)
much less borrowing than in PDE
small amounts of borrowing from
How does OE differ from PDE in terms of how words are built?
a lot more prefixes (for same word/verb)
More compounding
Kennings = non-transparent, imaginative compounds
Flesh-hoard, bone-house = body
Swan-road, whale-road = sea
Which nominal inflections exist in OE and how is this different from PDE?
number
OE
Singular sometimes markes
many regular plural morphemes
PDE
singular unmarked
One regular plural morpheme
gender
masculine, feminine, neuter (grammatical gender, everynoun)
3rd sg pronouns agree in person, number and gender with their antecedente
case
nominative
accusative
dative
genitive
instrumental
What function does the case of the nominative indicate?
subject (agent, doer, possesor of attributes)
subject complement
Pronoun (she ist the queen)
adjective following “to be” (i.e. tobe sleepy)
Direct adress (“vocative)
“You murderer”
What function does the case of the accusativeindicate?
Direct object (of Verb)
He touched the door
PP-complement for some prepositions (not relevant anymore fpr PDE)
he rides through the town
Time (without preposition)
The next day he left
What function does the case of the dative indicate?
indirect object (of verb; recipien/beneficiary)
he gives the man the dog
Direct object (of selected verbs)
the queen helps the king
possessive (of body parts)
PP-complement (some prepositions, e.g. to)
he rides to the prince
time (w/o preposition)
at times
Other relations (causes, experiences, ADJ-complement)
the king liked pears (Dem König gefallen…)
What function does the case of the genitive indicate?
PP-complement (few prepositions, e.g. andlang/along)
time (w/o prepositions)
Other relations
What function does the case of the instrumental (=specialised dative) indicate?
instrumental, means of action
Open the Door with the key
PP-complement (few preps, e.g.mid (along with)
time (w/o prep)
How does inflection differ from derivation?
Inflection does not result in change of word class (noun still noun, even if it is feminine, accusative and plural)
ususally produces a predictable, nonidiosyncratic (= not unique) change of meaning
Derivation = creating new word (often by adding suffix/prefix, compounding etc.)
What different component of class exist in regards to OE nouns?
strong vs. weak
most nouns strong
athematic
minor declension
What can be said about strong nouns?
60% of all OE nouns strong m/n
25% strong fem nouns
m/n: a-stem nouns
f: o-stem nouns
Influenced PDE noun endings (-s plural) due to analogy, inconicity (adding something (instead of changing something in the middle of the word) to indicate the plural made sense) and salience (they were frequent)
Masc
Nom/acc plural = -as ending
Neut
Nom/acc pl.: -u/- ending
Fem
Nom/acc pl. -a, -e
Nom sg: -u, -
acc sg: -e
In common for all strong noungs
gen pl. -a (- sometimes -ena for feminine pl.)
dat. sg. -e
dat. pl. -um
What determines whether a strong noun is short or long?
Short nouns
(C)VC
(C)VVC
long nouns
CV:V, (C)VCC, CV:VC, CVVCC
What are weak nouns and how can they be detected?
n-stem nouns
in sg. acc, dativ, gen (m/n/w)
in pl.
Nom/Acc: -an
Gen: ena
D: -um
What are athematic nouns?
Also called root-consonant stem nouns/ i-mutation nouns
Nouns that (before OE) ended with -iz, which led to the vowel before to become more like i (assimiliated)
manniz -> men
-iz was dropped, vowel changed
Those nouns have
no ending in nom/acc (sg & pl)
no ending in dat and inst. sg.
-es gen. sg. ending
-a gen. plk. ending
- um dat. ending
Which groups of minor declension nouns exist?
-u nouns
z-nouns
r-nouns
relationship/kinship nouns
th nouns
Which issues/challenges exist when identifying nouns in dictionaries?
Syncopation: two- or more syllabic words -> second vowel deleted when ending added
changes in stem vowels: fricatives, h-loss, vowel alternation
sg wealh - pl wealas (h dropped -> maybe add -h after suffix?)
OE sg daeg = dagas (turn a into ae)
-w, g- before ending
sg. here = pl. hergas
sg. beadu = pl. beadwa
What Vowels were part of the Old English language? What can be further said about them?
front vowels
i (:)
e (:)
ae (:)
y(:)
oe(:)
back vowels
u(:)
o(:)
a(:)
Diphtongs
eo / e:o
aea / ae:a
Vowel system symmetrical: for every short vowel corresponding long vowel
Rounded frontvowels (y, oe) unstable
Formed relatively late through i-mutation
Unrounded again soon from OE to ME (oe -> e, y -> i)
What consonant phonemes exist in Old English?
Labial
Dental
Alveolar
Palato-alveolar
Palatal
velar
Stops
P, b
D, t
K, g, ɣ
Fricatives
F v
th
S z
Affricatives
Tsh, dsh
H, x
Nasals
m
N nj
Liquids
L, r
semivowels
j
w
What does it mean if a language is rhotic?
Old English rhotic
rhotic = r pronounced (like in irish dialect)
What are spontaneous vs. combinatory sound changes and what are some examples for each category?
Spontaneous/unconditioned sound changes ocurr regardles of the words environment
Development of Westgermanic /a/ /a:/
Development of Westgermanic Diphtongs
comibartory/conditioned sound changes ocurr based on words environment
Breaking
Palatal diphtongisation
Restoration of /a/ /a:/ before backvowels
I-mutation
What does the “development of Westgermanic /a/ /a:/” refer to?
Westgermanic /a(:)/ became OE /æ/ /æ(:)/
i. e. Hand -> Hænd
BUT: WGmc /a/ /a:/ + nasal (m, n) = OE /o/
Kamen -> comen
What does the “development of Westgermanic Diphtongs” refer to?
WG /ai/ became OE /a/
WG /au/ became OE /æ:a/ (spelled ea)
What does “Breaking” refer to?
Linguistic change from prehistoric OE to OE
æ / e / i + H, H + consonant, L + C, r + C =
æ = /æa/ (spelled ea)
e = eo
i = io
Regional variation, not in all dialects of OE
What does “the restoration of /a/ before backvowels” refer to?
When /æ/ comes after backvowel (a, o, u) it turns into a
dæg -> dagas
What does “palatal diphtongisation” refer to?
Consonants: sc, c, g (/j/) +
/æ/, /e/ =
/ea/, /ie/
What is i-mutation? And where is it visible?
If a stressed syllable is followed by an unstressed syllable containing /i/ or /j/, the stressed vowel is raised/fronted (a -> æ, y -> i, u -> y etc.)
In prehistoric OE, after the mutation had taken place, the unstressed suffix (-iz) which caused change in first place was dropped or changed to [e] or schwa -> cause not visible anymore
Visible in…
root of nouns: goose -> geese
2nd and 3rd person sg. of certain verbs (ich helfe, du hilfst, er hilft)
Comparative of certain adjectives
Which different kinds of pronouns exist?
Personal (I, You, She, He)
Possessive (my, his, yours)
Demonstrative (that, those)
Interrogative (what, how, which)
Indefinite (some, any)
Relative (which, that, who)
What is special about Old English possessive pronouns?
1st and and 2nd person possesive pronouns (but not 3rd person possessive pronouns) agree with the noun they refer to and are declined like adjectives
You see your queen
Queen f. sg. acc -> your has to be declined like that (. acc., depending on noun class strong/weak)
What is a noun phrase?
phrasal unit consisting of
a noun
optional modifier
determiner
quantifier
adjective phrase
How do PDE and OE noun phrases differ and how are they similiar?
Both OE and PDE noun phrases have definite and indefinite NP
Unlike PDE, OE noun modifierts (quantifiers, adjectives, determiners) agree with noun in
Describe the morphological structure of nouns
i.e. Gmc dag-a-z
root = dag
indicates semantic meaning
thematic element: -a-
signals declension class
inflection: -z-
forms relations with other words
Root + thematic element = stem
gives name to Gmc declensions
Which frequent Old English declension classes exist?
vowel stems
-a- (masc.,neut.) -> stan, stanas
-o-(fem.) -> giefu
Less frequent: -i- (m, f, n), -u- (m, f)
consonant stems
weak -n- declension (m, f, n): guma - guman
minor declenisons (minor because less frequent)
Athematic (root) nouns (m, f)
r-nouns for relationships (m, f): faeder, modor
-nd- (m): freond
dental stems (m, f, n): monaph
What can be said about OE noun gender?
Masculine, feminine, neuter
Grammatical but mostly arbitrary
tendency to use he and heo anaphorically to refer to nouns with male and female referent
OE gender in 95% of cases same as German gender
What is the casus rectus and what is the casus obliqui?
casus rectus: nominative
casus obliqui: all other cases, i.e. dative, accusative, genitive and instrumental
instrumental not explicitly expressed in OE nouns
rather in adjectives and demosntratives
What is syncretism?
When two things have a different function, but the same form, i.e. when nom. pl. inflection is the same as acc. sg. inflection
What can be said about OE ronouns and agreement?
Pronouns agree with nouns in terms of
gendernumber
person (first, second, third)
Additional to singular and plural: dual
us two, you two, those two etc.
What different kinds of demonstratives exist? What can be said about cases and demonstrative?
First demonstrative: (se, seo): indicates definiteness
Second demonstrative (pes, peos): indicates proximity
Instrumental demonstratives: associated with demonstratives associated with instruments, i.e. digging with a shoveö
What can be said about OE determiners?
In PDE definite/indefinite articles (I saw a woman/ I met the king) obligatory with most singular common nouns -> not in OE
Demonstrative (se, pes) pronouns used like definite articles
Noun without determiner signals that it is not definite
Other way to signal definiteness in OE: adjectives (strong declensino: indefinite)
What were determiners used for in Old English?
Determiners: the (definite), a (indefinite)
Pronominal and adjective function (i.e. used as pronouns or adjectives)
also used in construction of subordination types
relative (i.e. “se be” = “that which”
Adverbial (for paem phe = “because”)
modifying se covers domains of PDE…
…demonstrative that
…definite article the
BUT
can be used with proper name (se Thomas)
Often absent where PDE would require an article or demonstrative
Can be used with possessive
What can be said about OE adjective agreement?
OE adjectives modified basd on NP, therefore agree with nouns in terms of
Adjectives can further have strong/weak declension, which indicates the nouns (in)definiteness
For nouns, strong (vocalic)/weak (consonantal, n-inflection) difference is about classification -> a noun can NOT be both strong and weak
For adjectives, strong/weak indicates definiteness
weak adjectives: definiteness (Der gute König)
often -an declension
no instrumental case
also used in possessives
strong adjectives: indefiniteness (Ein guter König)
also used with numerals and quantifiers
NP are definite when they are introduced by a demonstrative (the, that etc.) or possessive (my, your etc.)
-> if noun phrase with the/that/my/your etc. -> weak adjective
Some adjectives cannot be declined, they just are the way they are
What can be said about the degree of comparison in adjectives?
Comparative (i.e. “more beautiful”)
always weak declension
-ora, -ira
Superlative (i.e. “the most beautiful”)
strong and weak declension
-ost, -est
Periphrastic (i.e. “more” easy, “most” easy, where more/most are written/said) very rare in OE
How are numerals declined in OE?
Numerals like adjectives
Aan (one) usually declined like strong adjectives
twega/twa (“two”) and prie/preo (“three”) own declension system
4+ not declined
What different types of verbs exist in Old English in general? Where do they come from and what have they become?
Strong verbs
Derived from indo-European
Tense formed with
Ablaut
Vowel gradation
Today mostly irregular verbs
Weak verbs
Germanic creation
Past tense + participle II created with dental suffix /d/ or /t/
Today mostly regular verbs
Irregular verbs
Individual conjugation patters
mix of features of strong and weak verbs
Today: irregular verbs and modal verbs
What is ablaut? How does it relate to OE verbs and which further distinction can be made?
Ablaut = internal vowel alternation marking grammatical distinction
Part of strong verbs declension
Can be
Qualitative: change of vowel/phoneme
Quantitative: change in vowel length
Both qualitative and quantitative
What is characteristic for the seven classes of strong verbs and which change patterns are part of each class?
How did weak verbs develop in OE?
Derived from
nouns
strong verbs
Adjectives
Weak verbs normally causative
IE: bitan, bat -> bat -jan- (iE) -> baetan (= cause to bite)
Often i-mutation because of -j-
Which are the 3 classes of weak verbs?
Class I:
-j- suffix -> i-mutation
often gemination (doubling of consonants)
BUT: r prevents gemination
also some class I verbs with unmutated past tense -> presumably -j- never part of stem
Class II:
-oj- suffix
no i-mutation
Class III:
What different kinds of irregular verbs exist?
Anomalous
Suppletive verbs
Several different (lexical) stems used to for preterite and/or present form
Beon - eom/eart/is/sindon
gan - eode - gegan
PDE: go - went - gone
other idiosyncrasies (NOT suppletive)
don - dyde - gedon (“do”) (odd preterite)
wilan - wolde (odd present indicative and preterite)
Preterite present verbs
A few verbs which combine strong and weak declension
ablaut in present (-> from strong declension)
dental sffix in past (-> from weak declension)
Originally strong verbs whose preterite in Germanic came to acquire present tense meaning -> new preterite formed with dental suffix
i.e. “knew” = if one kne something in the past, they probably still know it now
Semantically divided into
modal verbs (auxillary verbs which express necessity or possibility, such as “should”, “could”, “must”)
Verbs of mental perception (know, think etc.)
Verbs of possession: agan - ah/agon (pres.) — ahte (pret) (= to have)
How were tenses which weren’t present or past expressed in Old English?
Time-relationships other than past and present were expressed
implicit in context
with help of contextual features such as adverbs
Compound tense in OE
Rise of compound tense in OE
Use in future
Sculon (should) + infinitive
Use in past tense
Heafde + ge-(verb)
Use in perfect
Beon for intransitive verbs (need no object to make sense)
Habban for transitive verbs (needs object to make sense)
Could be used, but wasn’t yet officially part of OE grammar and thus not necessary
What are Grimms law and Verners law and why are they relevant in regards to OE verbs?
Grimms law: Proto-Indoeuropean voiceless stops (p, d, k) became Germanic voiceless fricatives (f, th, s)
Verners law/exception:
PIE voiceless stops (p, d, k) became Germanic voiced stops (b, t, g, y)
Rule applied if PIE accent/stress on immediately preceding syllable
Therefore the following changes apply:
f <-> b/v
Th <-> d/th
s <-> z > r
h <-> g/Y
hw <-> gw
How did the Old-English writing system change?
Futhorc = Anglo-Saxon runes/alphabet -> carved into hard material like stones, so quite angular
Introduction of paper/softer materials by Romans/Christianity -> softer and imported alphabet, some letters taken over (like the thorn)
Also changes in punctuation and conventions (such as how a poem is written)
What orthorgraphic changes have occured in regards to the OE language to PDE?
scip -> ship
sc -> sh
OE ecg -> edge
cd -> dg
Change from OE to ME
Disappearance of thorn (replacement with th)
gradual change from OE to ME
What lexical changes exist and have occurred in the English language since OE?
Lexical loss: words are not used anymore
OE “witan” -> Still survived in German “wissen”
OE “Here” (Army -> German “Heer”)
OE "Galdor” = song
OE “Ymbe” = around
Lexical additions: new words added to vocabulary
Street, sock, window, church etc.
Additions from
Norse
Greek
Arabic
etc.
Which types of semantic change exist and how did they ocurr in Old English?
Broadening/generalization: from specific meaning to more general meaning
Mill = specifically corn mill -> more generally place where things are made
dog = breed of doge -> any dog
Narrowing/specialization: from general to more specific meaning
Hound = any dog -> specific breed of dog
Deer = any animal -> deer
Meat = any food -> meat
Semantic shift: Change of meaning, though not specifically to better/worse or more specific/general meaning
write = scratch -> write
Pejoration: Development of a words towards a more negative meaning
Silly = blessed -> foolish
Knave = boy -> villain
Amelioration: development of a word towards a more positive meaning
knight = servant -> nobleman
marchal = somebody in charge of horses -> somebody in charge of cavalry
-> Often a mix of semantic changes instead of a word changing specifically and only in terms of narrowing/broadening, amelioration/pejoration
Which kinds of phonological changes exist and what examples thereof exist in the development of OE?
Phoneme addition:
Zodica: ME [sodiak] -> PDE [zeudiak]
Phoneme loss:
Loss of ç, loss of kn
Knight: ME [kniçt] -< PDE [nait]
Which causes of spontaneous/unconditioned language change exist?
obscure: spontaneous drift/trend of a language
Mechanical
Speech defects, false teeth, adenoids -> dialectical variations and change
Articulatory settings of a language (position of tongue, lips, jaw) may cause preference for fronting, raising, retraction etc.
Variation in speech production: for instance we don’t talk the same way to children as adults, something like this might spreach and change the language as a whole
Suprasegmental features (stress and intensity, pitch, intonation, tempo, qunantity of rhythmic patterns)
increased stress -> lenghtening of syllable (often s lengthened due to stress)
less stress -> lowering and centralization
I > ə
[ʊ] > [ə, ʌ]
Forceful style vs. relaxed style
Language contanct: influence of substrata, neighboring languages
Social: change in fashion, socially accepatble/rejected features
What types of sound changes exist?
Metathesis: reversal of letters withing words
OE/ME brid -> PDE bird
Consonant Cluster reduction
OE hlaford -> PDE lord
Assimilation
Palatalization: consonants become softer (skip -> ship)
Apocope: reduction of unstressed syllable -> final stress lost
Child -> tschail
Syncope: loss of stressed segment in medial position
family -> fam’ly
What is one important morphological change in the history of the English language and what did it further lead to?
Loss of weak declension in adjectives from OE to ME -> new marker for definiteness necessary -> rise of demonstratives
Phonological changes lead to morphological changes after certain time, and those lead to further changes in language
What syntactic change occurred in the history of the English language and why did this change ocurr?
Loss of inflections from OE led to the necessity of demonstrating relations between words in another way -> from flexible to fixed word order in sentences
individual patterns, e.g. negation
What pragmatic change ocurred in the historiy of the English language from OE to PDE?
Loss of second person singular
OE: ge (2nd sg.) and phu (2nd pl.)
ME: Singular for politeness (thou), plural for all others (inc. 2nd sg -> you)
PDE: you for everyone, 2nd sg & pl
Why does language change?
extra-linguistic reasons
Changes in the world
cultural contact
migration
Social reasons
social identity
social status
Language acquisition and interaction
acquisition: change in generation
interaction: accomondation to other peoples speech
Structural
System-internal pressure
intralinguistic reasons
Function
Avoidance of ambiguity
desire for expressiveness
iconicity
economy of effort
rule-extension (misunderstanding rule and overusing it until it becomes “new rule”)
analogy
reanalysis
grammaticalization
transparency principle
naturalness
What is analogy in terms of linguistic change?
Extension of morphological entites
i.e. Plural -s, -en, -ru
ME shoon -> shoes
Mice/mouse -> mouses for computer mouse
Past tense marking
strive - strove - striven -> originally word taken from french, but decllined like this because it is similiar to “drive”
What is ambiguity and reanalysis in terms of linguistic change and what examples thereof exist in OE?
When things are ambiguous they are reanalyzed and (sometimes) changed
Example: modals
Modals had several meanings
Over time reanalyzed so they only have one meaning -> became grammatical verbs instead of lexical ones
example kan (know)
Example: progressive
Two verbs which often appear next to eachother are at some point interpreted as belonging together and creating meaning together
“When he was in the temple, teaching his disciples”
originally: “When he was in the temple, teaching his disciples”
New: He was teaching his disciples in the temple (was teaching together)
How was the world conceptualised in the middle ages (until 15th century)?
Christian view -> Jerusalem at the center
Asia on top
How did people in the Middle Ages conceptualize language?
Until end of the 18th century: biblical view
“Whole world had one language (Hebrew) until the destruction of the tower of babel (miracle of the Pentecost) -> all languages derived from hebrew
What changed the view of the middle ages, that all languages derived from Hebrew?
Positivism
empirical data
formal logic
comparative method
Sir William Jones
believed that
Greek, Sanskrit and Latin
Gothic and Celtic and Persian
all derived from same family
What is the impact of William Jones insight and which different relationships between languages can exist?
Jones gave rise to “comparative linguistics”
Relations between languages
Genetic linguistics = genetic relations between languages -> roots and branches of languages
i.e. relationship between Latin and French
Contact linguistics
language change through language contact instead of due to common ancestry
i.e. using word “computer” in German/”Anglizismen”
Typological linguistics
structural similiarities without common genetics or historical connectedness -> similiarities because of fundamental features that are inherently part of every language
How old are languages? How old is Indo-European? Germanic? English?
50’000 - 100’000 years ago: development of language likely, 100’000 often proposed (but no written records thereof)
10’000 years ago/8000 BC: languages which were spoken at this time can be reconstructed by comparing different early languages, but no written record
8000-9500 years ago/ 7500 - 6000 BC: Minority view of origin of IE: -> spoken at this time in Anatolia (Turkey), language arose with the spread of farming
6000 years ago/4000 BC: Majority view of origin of IE: IE spoken at that time in modern day Ukraine
3700 +/- 1000 years BC: latest date at which IE is expected to have been spoken
5000 years ago/ 3000 BC: earliest written records (of any language), but most written records more recent
1600 BC: Anatolian/Hittie language
source: culeyform clay tablets
1500 BC: Sanskrit/Indo-Aryan
source: Vedas go back to at least 1500 BC
1400 BC: Greek -> inscriptions in syllabic scropt
8h century BC: Greek -> literary texts in Greek alphabet
6th-7th century BC: Old Iranian: Avestan
6th century Old Persian
6th century BC: Latin inscriptions
3rd centuy BC: literary Latin texts
400 AD: earliest written records of Germanic
Gothic biblical translation by Wulfila, written in Greek based alphabet
Runic inscriptions in Proto-Norse
700 AD onwards: documentation of English
Which two view exist in regards to the age and origin of Indo-European?
Majority view
Minority view
Time period
arose 6000 years ago
arose 8000-9500 years ago
Location of language
Spoken in modern day Ukraine
Spoken in Anatolia (Turkey)
Further views
Evidence:
linguistic palaeontology (animals, plants, objects and where they would be most likely to be found)
Words connected to wheeled vehicles can be found in all IE languages -> wheels must’ve existed when IE was spoken -> archeology tells us that wheels were not used earlier than 6000 years ago
Arose with spread of farming
Which two conflicting models concerning human migration exist?
Regional continuity/Multiregional model:
Homo sapiens interbred with earlier populations (homo neanderthalensis and homo erectus)
Out of Africa II/African eve: recent african origin, later expansion of Homo sapiens replacing earlier populations
-> merging with older humans or erasing them essentially
When were which parts of the world colonized by humans?
160-120’000 years ago: Africa
120’000-90’000 years ago: Israel, Arabia
60-45’000 years ago:
Turkey
Mediterranean Europe
India
China
Australia
45-20’000 years ago
Northern Europe
Siberia
Far east
15’000 years ago: Americas
Which markers are used to determine if and when humans spoke languages?
A few assumptions
Physical features necessary to handle language -> large brain, articulation organs
brain size of Neanderthal 1’200-1’750 cubuc cm
brain size of humans 1’000-2000 cubic centimeters
Behavioral prerequisites of language -> assumption: people must’ve been able to speak to pass on those inventions, must’ve lived in a community etc.
fire use
complex tool kit
artefacts
burials
How is Darwin relevant for linguistics?
1859, Charles Darwin: the Origin of Species -> not only species evolve, also language
What is the comparative method in linguistics and how does it work?
Method to discover relationships between languages and reconstruct dead languages
Steps
Hypothetize that certain languages may be related
Eliminate languages which are clearly not related
apply systematic methodology (= comparative reconstruction) to
establish genetic relationship of (recorded) related languages
reconstruct (unrecorded) “parent languages”
Rules:
When sound is similiar in many cognates but different in only a few, it is likely that the many cognates retain the original sound (so the original word/phonology sounded more like them than like the exception)
Souns in cognates must be derivable from reconstructed souns in as few steps as possible
The reconstructed changes must be phonetically plausible
Loss or merger more likely than addition or split
Additionally:
often done first on basic parts of language, such as numerals
What is linguistic paleontology?
Use of linguistic data (=lexical items) to draw conclusions about
the environment and
culture of people who spoke
an unrecoreder but reconstructed language
Idea: if we can reconstruct a word for something, they must’ve known that thing
Often evidence based on
flora
fauna
climate
Sometimes not clear, for instance a word for a tree could have multiple meanings (different types of trees)
What is the origin of Indo-European? Where was it spoken first?
Many different theories
Main theories
Marija Gimbutas (1956): Kurgan Hypothesis
Based on excavations of horses and chariot -> military equipment and it’s spread
Connection between artefacts found in specific space and its spread to other negihbouring places
iE origin according to this theori in Caucasus
Colin Renfrew (1987): Anatolian Hypothesis
Home of iE in Anatolia (Turkey), spread from there based on agriculture -> Farming diffusion
Assumes that iE people were farmers who spread to places of hunters and gatherers and brought agriculture there
Which theory is right?
Based on genetic data etc. it could be confired that both theories are right
Originally iE homo lived between Caucasus and turkey
8000 years ago: migration from Anatolia
7000 years ago: first major stop in Caucasus
From Caucasus bigger spread to other places
What is the “centum split” of indo European?
Languages which derivate from Proto-Indoeuropean split itno
Languages where PIE palatals (/k/) continued as velars: k -> c
Anatolian
Tocharian
Languages where PIE palatals (/k/) continued as sibliants: k -> s/sh
Indo-Iranian
Balto-Slavic
Armenian
Albanian
-> Grouping based on similiar development
What is Bishop Wulfians bible and why is it relevant?
One of the earliest Germanic texts (4th - 6th century)
Translation of bible gospels into Gothic
Writing resembles greek writing -> Wulfua probably knew/spoke Greek
What is the Gallehus inscription and why is it relevant?
Early Germanic text (early 5th century)
Replica of twin golden horns (original stolen and melted down) found at Gallehus in Sout Jutland
Runic inscription around the rim -> because of runes/inscription on hard material rather short inscription
Short text with alliteration -> attempt at poetry (works according to Germanic laws of poetry)
Which linguistic changes occurred from iE to Germanic?
First and second merger
iE /a/ and /o/ -> Gmc /a/
Latin octo -> Gothic ahatau (German Acht)
iE /a:/ and /o:/ -> Gmc /o:/
Greek phrater -> OE bro:phor
Grimms Law (1st consonant shift) & Verners law
Accent shift: from dynamic word stress to stress in fixed position -> rootinitial syllable stressed
Rise of new categories: development of weak inflection-system for adjectives
Development of new class for weak verbs with dental past tense
What distinguishes the three weak verbs classes?
Class: affected by i-mutation
Class: not affected by i-mutation
Class: Pretty much all kinds of alternations
belonging to this class: habban (have), libban (live), secgan (say), hycgan (think)
Affected by
Gemmination
i-mutation
Verners law
Syncopations (different forms for same declension, i.e. haefede/haefde)
How are non-finite forms constructed in Old English?
Pariciple 1 (present)
Persent + -end suffix (i.e. fremman -> fremmende)
i.e. “spielend”
Participle 2
Strong verbs: Ge- + grad 4 of ablaut + -n (ridan -> geriden)
weak verbs: ge - + stem + -d/-t-/-th: gremman -> gefremed
i.e. “gespielt”
Infinite
uninflected: +-an suffix (fremman)
inflected: to + -enn: to fremmenne
What are contracted negatives?
Verbs which incorporate the “not” into the lexe, so witan (to know) becomes nytan (not know), habben (to have) becomes nabban (not have) etc.
What does gemmination in a verb indicate?
Verb belongs to
Strong class V or VI
OR
Weak class I
When is the beon stem used, when the eom stem?
Beom stem: invariable fact or future
Eom stem: expresses present
Which different verb moods exist and what do they signify?
Imperative: commands, often at beginning of a sentence followed by a pronouns
i.e. “Go!”
Indicative: True propositions
Subjunctive:
Doubtful propositions (i.e. “if you loved me, you would let me…")
Obligations, desires: “I wish I were here” “You better stop”
Reported speech: “He told me he was going to”
Hortative subjunctive: something like a wish and a command, like “god save the queen”
What is concord?
Agreement in gender, case, number and/or person between different words that share a reference
Which issues of concord ocurr with different subject “problems”?
Split subject: i.e. “A and his sons comes tomorrow”
Would have to be plural, but is singular because subject was split
Subject-less classes: Subject not explicitly stated, implied by declension of verb (kind of like italian, “Vado via” without an explicit “io”
Sometimes has to be deciphered based on context
Impersonal subject
non-canonical subject: Subject in dative/accusative (i.e. “Dem König gefallen die Birnen”)
often about hunger, thirst and liking
placed holders, dummy subjects
“It is fitting that he will be well taught…”
Which forms of morphologcial simplifications occurred from the development of IE into Germanic?
Noun inflection simplified from eight cases down to four (plus some residuals)
Germanic: Nominative, Accusative, Dative, Genitive, (instrumental)
Additionally in IE: Vocative, Ablative, Locative
Verb inflection simplified
Loss of most tenses and aspect distinctions
With italic: generalized IE perfecte tense for past tense
Development of new composite forms
Which forms of morphologcial complexicfications occurred from the development of IE into Germanic?
Germanic (and Balto-Slavic) develop new weak inflection system for adjectives
Germanic develops new class of weak verbs with dental pas-tense suffix
Which morphological developments occurred from IE to germanic, which cannot clearly be defined as comlexification or simplification?
Lexical change: Germanic innovations which do not have IE cognates
Bone, broad, cliff, drink, drive, even, fowl, ground, hand
With Balto-Slavic: display of -m- (OE -um) suffix in dative/instrumental plural
Which phonological changes occurred to the language when it developed from IE into Germanic?
Centum-satem split within IE families
Gmc in centum group
Two vowel mergers
Accent shift to root-initial syllables
Consonant shift
First consonant shift (500 BC, from IE to Protogermanic)
Grimms Law & Verners Law
Distinguishes Germanic from other IE languages
Second consonant shift (500700 AD)
From Westgermanic to High German -> Distinguishes high German from other West Germanic languages
Who discovered the first consonant shift and what is characteristic of the first consonant shift?
Rasmus Kristian Rask (1787-1832): noted crucial correspondence between “Thracian” (Proto Indoeuropean) and Gothic (Proto Germanic)
Jacob Ludwig Karl Grimm (1785-1863)
Wrote “Deutsche Grammatic, Band I” (1819-22)
Provided wider demosntration of the law, established two major features
Feature-shift identical regardless of articulatory position of consonants
Shifts are interrelated
Shifts are system-preserving
Grimms term: Lautverschiebung
What changed in words during the first consonant shift?
From voicelss stops to voiceless fricatives
IE: *p t k kw -> Gmc: f th h hw
Latin pater -> english father
Centum -> hundred
Greek kardia -> English heart
Quod -> what
From voiced stops to voiceless stops
IE b d g gw -> Gmc: p t k kw
Latin labium -> Swedish läpp
Latin genu -> German knie
From voiced aspirated stops to voiceless stops
IE: bh dh gh gwh -> b d g gw
Sanscrit bhrata -> English brother
Which exceptions exist in regards to the first consonant shift?
Consonannt clusters
Consonant clusters with s: If there was an s before the consonant that would be changed, the change did not take place
Latin spuere -> IE spiwan
Latin stare -> OE standan
Consonant clusters with t (pt, kt)
only prevented consonant shift if consonant close to t
If IE stress was on the preceding syllable, the IE voiceless stops (p t k kw) did not turn into fricatives but rather into voiced stops:
p -> b (instead of f)
k -> g (instead of h)
t -> d (instead of th)
s -> z (or r) -> only consonant affected by Verners law which wasnt affected by first consonant shift
Where is Verners law visible?
Can be seen in Germanic “fader” (from pater, should be father)
Most visible in declension of strong verbs
weorthan - wearth - wurdon - geworden
originally a t
Teon - teah - tugon - getogen
originally a k which turned into g or h
ceosan - ceas - curon - gecoren
What happened during the second consonant shift?
500-700 AD, from Westgermanic to High Germanic
WGmc
OHG
When?
What exactly?
p t k
pf tz kx
initially
After consonants
in gemination (doubbling)
k -> kx only in upper German
voiceless stops -> voiceless/long affricatives
OE pad -> OHG pfeit
OE tacen -> OHG zeichan
OE caru -> OHG chara
ff zz xx
Medially between vowels
At the end of words
OHG griphan -> OHF griffan
OE laetan -> OHG lezzan
OE ic -> OHG ih
Phorn (th)
d
Voiceless fricative -> voiced stop
OE thrie -> OHG dri (three)
(b) d (g)
(p) t (k)
B -> p and k -> g only in upper German
Voiced plosives -> voiceless plosives
OE biernan -> OHG prinnan -> ModHG brennen
OE deop -> OHG tiof -> ModHG tief
How can the geographical spread of the second consonant shift be subdivided?
North less affected than south
Benrath line
Line from Cologne to Leipzig
places above less affected by 2nd consonant shift
Speyer line
Above: Frankfurt, Cologne, Luxembourg (between Benrath and Speyer line) -> medially affected
Below: Strasbourg (strongly affected)
Which Germanic languages were more or less affected by the second consonant shift?
Low German least affected, Upper German most affected
Very visible in Swiss German (i.e Kind -> Chind)
What can be said about Old English syntax?
Freer order than in present day English (today subject - verb - object order) because inflection signifies relation
Slight tendency to put Verb in 2nd place in clause in OE, regardless of what the first element is
Often heavy stuff towards the end, light stuff at the beginning
Pronouns often short and easy -> often early in the sentence
Verb typically a bit heavier -> when short subject, verb might be moved towards the end
Also with indirect - direct object
Adverbs even more flexible than in PDE (can be pretty much anywhere)
What are etymological doublets/triplets?
Words who share same etymological origin but developed differently in different cognates/branches of the language and were eventually “readopted” by one language, where they were given a slightly different semantic meaning
I.e. PIE “brether” (brother) became
Sanskrit: “bhratr” -> Romani “phral” -> readopted by English as “pal” (= friend)
Latin “frater” -> Old French “frere” -> readoptet by English as friar (brother of a religious order)
Proto Germanic: “brother” -> OE “brothor” -> English “brother”
What differentiates derivational and inflectional morphology?
Derivational morphology: creation of new word with new semantic/meaning, done with…
Suffixation: adding suffix to noun, verbs, etc.
Prefixation: adding prefix to certain words
Compounding: reuniting two stems to create new word
-> normally results in more specific meaning
Inflectional morphology: changing inflection of a word, no new meaning, serves to signal grammatical/syntactic function
What are kennings?
Specific subgroup of compounds -> poetical compounding
“Kennings” from “kennen” because one needs to know the meaning of kennings to understand them, hard to decipher just based on word stems
Kennings often about battles/war or the sea
Ban-cofa = Bone chamber = body
Herou-wulf = fierce wolf = warrior
What is the difference between cultural loanwords and core loanwords?
Cultural loanwords: adopting the word of another language as well as the meaning of the concept/object the word describes, because the word/concept does not (yet) exist in recipient language
Examples: computer (adoption into German language), pizza, pasta (adoption into English language)
Special fields of knowledge can be associated with specific donor language
Core loanwords: duplication of elements that are present in recipient language (there is already a word for that thing, but the word from that thing from another language is adopted into recipient language and adopted word is used slightly differently)
Are associated with prestige, often words first adopted by and/or from socially more powerful community (Scandinanvian loand in Danelaw, French loans after Norman conquest)
Replace native expressioin with same semantic meaning (i.e. “wer” (OE) lost and replaced by “husband” (Scandinavian)) or
introduce semantic/pragmatic differentiation (i.e. F. “mutton” more prestigious lamp/sheep)
What can be said about Celtic loanwords in the English language?
Very few loanwords given the extensive contact with the Celts
Number of Celtic loanwords in English in general: 597
Three periods of loaning
Continental loanwords which also ocurred in other Germanic languages
Ambeht = servant, service
Rice = rule, reign
Loanwords from the settlement periods
Bannuc = flat, round bread
Bratt = cloak
Penn = hill, top
Loanwords from Christianization period
ancor = hermit
Cross
Dry = magician, sorcerer
Which different ways exist to periodizise Latin lonwords in Old English?
Categorization 1
Continental loanwords: before migration to Britain (pre 450)
Insular loanwords (after migration to Britain, post 450)
450-600: settlement period
600-950: Pre-Benedictine refomre period (pre Christianization)
950-1066: Post-Benedictine reform period (post Christianization)
Categorization 2
Early/pre Chrisian loanwords: Continental loanwords & settlement period (pre 450 until 600)
Late loanwords: pre- and Post-Benedictine Period (600-1150)
What is characteristic of the continental loanwords from Latin?
Loanwords from pre 450 AD
Borrowed from vulgar (= spoken) Lating
C. 170 everyday words
Have congates in other Germanic languages
Prominent categories
Plants/animals
piper, elephend
Food/household items
candela
win < vinum
Buildings/constructions
weall < vallum
Dress
belt < balteus
cemes < camisia
Military/legal
Camp, campian, cempa < campus
Commercial
manger, mangia < mango
What is characteristic of the insular loans from Latin I?
450-600, pre-Christianization
Borrowed in Britain via Celtic language or British Latin (celticised Latin)
c. 100 Items (not all of them can surely be attribtued to this time/Latin loanwords)
ceaster < castra
Munt < mons
port < portus, porta
What is characteristic of loanwords from Latin II & III?
600-1150, post Christianisation
Anglo-Saxons speaking, writing, singing and translating in Lating, variation acquired in classroom/schools (which were estabilished by the church) -> predominantly loanwords connected to education or religion
canon < canon
fers < versus
studdian < studere
alter < altar
predican < predicare
sacred < sacredos
What can be said about semantic loaning from Latin? Which different ways of semantic loaning exist?
Meaning borrowed rather than form
Option 1, analogy: Source language and native language share one meaning for same word, an additional meaning from donor language is added
Lingua lat. “tongue, language” -> “tongue” comes to mean language aswell in OE/English (before only meant body part)
Option 2: new meaning transfered without a shared meaning
Res publica > cynedom now means Res Publica, even though very different concept
Which different ways of loan formation exist?
Loan-translations/calques: each element of the mode replicated in recipient language, word for word translation
miseri-cors -> mild-heort
nocti-coarx = noeht-hrefn
Loan-rendition
At least one morphological element is semantically equivalent to the model
discipulus = leorningcniht
still contains learning aspect, but has added cnith
Loan-creation
No elements correspond directly to the model (only idea loaned)
Diluvium = cwide-flod (death flood)
What can be said about scandinavian loanwords in Old English?
Scandinavian laonwords way more visible in Middle English than in Old English
Where Danelaw ruled more scandinavic loanwords
Written record of Danelaw almost non-existent
Examples of scandinavian loanwords in OE
Grith (=protection) < Old Norse Grith (“home, peace”)
Lagu “the body of rules” < ON “lagu”, something fixed
Utlage (= a person declared to be outside the law) < OI utlagi
-> many loanwords about Vikings or the law
What were the consequences of scandinavian loaning for the English language?
Scandinavian borrowing over time replaced many etymologically identical native words (words with same origin which developped differently)
Oe aeg, ME ey, ON egg -> PDE “egg”
OE gietan, ME yet, ON geta -> PDE get
OE wax, ME wok, ON veikr -> PDE weak
Scandinavian borrowing over time replaced synonymous native words
OE niman, ME nimen, ON taka -> take
OE seax, ME sax, ON knift -> knife
Scandinavian borrowing led to semantic change (usually narrowing/specialization) of native words
OE heofon = ON sky -> sky now general, heaven specific religious meaning
OE sterorfan = ON deyia = die now general, starve specific
Some scandinavian borrowing survived only in Northern Dialects
What does the basic structure of OE poems look like?
Rhythmical patterns based on line of four stresses
Strong medial dividions (caesure) into two-stress phases (half lines: a and b)
Structural alliteration linking the two halves
Which rhythmical patterns exist in OE poetry?
A type: / x / x (stressed — unstressed — stressed — unstressed) (= trochaic)
Gomban gyldan
B type: x / x / (unstressed — stressed — unstressed — stressed) (= iambic)
on flodes aecht
C-Type: x // x (unstressed — stressed — stressed — unstressed)
On geardagum
D-Type (also secondary stress included)
Where (or rather on which words) was stress put in Old English poetry?
Primary stress
Always: nouns, adjectives
Usually: infinitives, participles
sometimes: finite verbs
in emphatic position: adverbs
Secondary stress
Often: compounds
Sometimes: finite verbs
Unstressed
Conjunctions
Demonstatives
Prepostions
Prefixes, suffixes
What can be said about alliterations in Old English poetry?
Not necessarily same letter, but same sound
Alliteration always on stressed syllable
Alliteration links first and second half of verse
Can be done as
Both stresesd syllables in first half alliterate with first stressed syllable in second half line
o Gomban gyldan; thäae waes god cyning
Either of the stressed syllables in first half-line alliterate with first stressed syllable in second half
On flodes aeht feor gewitan
What can be said about the Old English poetic vocabulary?
Poetic words: beorn, guma, rinc, secg -> all meaning warrior man
Use of archaic full froms (genimeth for genimth)
Lots of compounds & kennings
Zuletzt geändertvor einem Jahr