What are the important facts to autophagy?
degradation of cytosolic components by lysosomal route
upregulated during starvation / stress
quality control (remove protein aggregates, non functional organelles, pathogens)
evolutionarily conserved
hand in hand with the Ubiquitin-proteasome system
protection from DNA damage and chromosomal instability
Endosomes (peroxisomes) and autophagosomes (from phagophore) fuse with lysosome —> the building blocks for the autolysosomes come from ER, mitos and start at the phagophore assembly site
Wahat is ERAD?
endoplasmatic reticulum-associated degradation
Recognition (of misfolded regions by Chaperones inside ER lumen, ER membrane or in cytosol)
Ubiquitination (E1 brings activated ubiquitin, E2 takes it in ATP-dependent process and E3 [ubiquitin ligase] transfers it to the client protein [Lysin residue])
Retrotranslocation (Enzyme complex interacts with ubiquitin and foces the protein removal via ATP hydrolysis, removal through channel (Retrotranslocon))
Degradation (26 S Proteasome with 3 peptidases cleaves protein, deubiquinating enzymes recycle the ubiquitin)
What is the difference between ERAD and ERLAD degradation?
ERAD is the degradation via proteasomes, the misfolded proteins are “marked” by ubiquitination
ERLAD is the degradation via lysosome, the misfolded protein is glycosylated and then segragated in an ER vesical (with ER phagy receptors) to be degraded
Name 3 sensors that trigger unfolded protein responses (UPR).
IRE1 pathway (regulated mRNA splicing initiated and then mRNA acts as TF and activates chaperone production)
PERK (directly reduce more protein production by phosphorylating translation initiation factors and then also activating chaperone transcription)
ATF6 (is a TF itself)
All sensors detect in ER lumen and signal cascades out in the cytosol
How are UPR and stress response in case of hypoxia connected?
Hypoxia = lack of oxygen —>triggers dimerization of hypoxia inducible factor 1 which leads to activation of genes (under normoxic conditions that factor is ubiquinated and degraded)
—> it also leads to misfolded proteins because disulphide linkages cant be formed that then triggers UPR because BiP normally binds to the 3 UPR sensors ATF6, PERK and IRE1, it dissociates and activates them when it binds to the mis/unfolded protein
IRE1 and ATF6 both activate transcriptional response whereas PERK also slows down protein translation by phosphorylating translation initiation factor
Hypoxia also inhibits the mTORC1 complex (containing mTOR (target of rapamycin kinase)) which control the whole translation machinery
—> alltogether the hypoxic cells metabolism, autophagy, angiogenese (new blood vessels) and ER homeostasis are altered
What stress responses do you know?
unfolded protein response —> ATF6, PERK, IRE1
hypoxia —> HiF1
heat shock —> HSF1
oxidation stress by ROS (reactive oxigen species) —> Nrf2 (production of antioxidants)
Why is it important to protect the mitochondria from stress induced damage?
—> because it drives the key energy source: the electron transport chain!
What does a growing ROS level trigger in mitochondria?
ROS = reactive oxygen species (O²-)
with rising levels more proteins are misfolded and accumulate, the UPRmt is activated if it fails or the ROS level rises too much it leads to mitochondrial damage and then cell death or it leads to mitophagy
What is a mitochondrial stress sensor in C. elegans?
ATFS-1 is a TF with a mitochandrial import signal (MTS) [normally dominant] and a nuclear import signal (NLS)
default —> import in Mitos (by TIM and TOM) and degraded (LON protease 1)
stress —> TIM/TOM import blocked so NLS imports it to nucleus and activates UPRmt stress response (as a TF -> genes that help regain mito function and import efficiency…)
What is TIM and TOM?
TIM and TOM is a mitochondrial channel complex with TOM (translocase of the outer membrane) at the cytosol membrane and TIM (translocase at the inner membrane) at the mitochondrial side of the membrane
ATP dependent import through both membranes
TOM with receptor domain for signal peptide (cleaved after translocation)
What is Mitophagy?
The kinase PINK1 binds to damaged Mitochondrium and recuits ubiquitin ligase Parkin
—> ubiquitination of mutiple outher membrane proteins of mito and autophagosomes and lysosomes degrade the Mitochondrium
Which environmental stess triggers which transcriptional response?
How do you generate a reporter gene that response to stress?
insert the reporter gene after the promoter that is activated by the TF of the stres response
BiP would be good choice simce IT IS the “First responder” to misfolded Proteins, when IT initiates all the Stress responses by unbinding from them when beimg recruited to the misfolded proteins
e.g. UPRer ATF6 is a direct TF insert the reporter gene after that promotor
or insert it into the transcribed gene for heat shock response hsp-16.2
How do you generate a reporter gene that is only active in a selected tissue?
You need to have a tissue selective promotor, that is only active in neurons or intestine, that promotor will then only allow transcribtion of the reporter gene in the selected tissue
How do you generate a gene that induces stress only in a selected tissue?
This is problematic in C. elegans because stress in neuron also activates stress response in intestine (i.g. the whole organism is affected by stress)
you can use tissue specific RNAi / RNAi blockade
Combination of KO mutant and cell specific promotor expression
Whats the difference between Macro-, micro- and chaperone mediated autophagy?
macroautophagy —> 2 membranes: an autophagosome transports the material in a vesicle to the lysosome
microautophagy (endosomal)—> 1 membrane: an endosome encloses the material into lysosome
chaperone mediated autophagy (CMA) —> 0 membrane: a chaperone transports e.g. a protein directly to a transloctor at the lysosome
Extra: Mitophagy, Exophagy, piecemeal autophagy of the nucleus
Name the steps of autophagy.
Induction
Autophagosome formation (ATGs = LC3 in mammels)
Vesicle fusion and autophagosome breakdown —> Autolysosome
Degradation (in pH 5 level of lysosome via acid hydrolases e.g. cathepsin)
How can autophagy be regulated? Step 1 The mTORC pathway:
Stress / lack of nutrients or energy / hormones and signaling events all affect (inhibit) the mTORC1 pathway
mTORC1 = mechanistic target of rapamycin 1
mTORC1 as the centre of many signaling pathways in presence of abundant nutrients and growth factors promotes cell growth and metabolic activity and inhibits the ULK1 complex (by binding and phospho inactivating it) and by that autophagy!
—> under stress inhibition of mTORC1 —> suppression of cell growth (energy saving) and induction of autophagy by releasing of ULK1 complex to enable stress adaptaion and suvival
Upstream signaling factors:
AMPK —> when high levels of AMP = low energy (AMPK can also phospho activate ULK1) (drug metformin mimics starvation and upregulates AMPK)
HIFs —> hypoxia inducable factors
TOR = Taget of rapamycin —> rapamycin (immunsuppressive drug)
How can autophagy be regulated? Step 2 VPS34:
Autophagy control by VPS34 is a positive regulation by membrane recruitment for phagophore assembly:
it recruits ATG complex (=LC3), Bcl-2, Beclin 1 —> phagophore assembly site
—> then the Autophagophore matures and fuses with lysosome —> autolysosome
Name examples for the correlation of autophagy and diseases.
neurodegeneration
positive: prevent intracellular proteins from accumulation to toxic levels
negative: inefficient lysosomal clearance results in accumulation of autophagosomes —> amyloid precursor into toxic forms
cancer
pos: tumor suppression by removing damaged organelles, growth factors and stabalize chromosomes
neg: protects cancer cells from treatments by helping them survive low nutrient supply
infection and immunity
pos: bacteria and virus removal
neg: microbes have evolved to use autophagy as their niche
Deregulation of autophagy has been linked to cancer, aging, neurodegeneration, metabolic disorders, fibrotic diseases — increasing autophagy is not always beneficial
How do you generate a UPRER reporter gene? Which gene do you choose (see lecture slides), how would you generate such a reporter gene? Which components does it need to contain to be expressed and, in particular, to be responsive to the ER stress response pathway?
Choose a UPRER-responsive promoter: Identify and select a promoter region that is known to be responsive to ER stress. The promoter region is crucial for controlling the expression of the reporter gene in response to ER stress. Commonly used promoters for UPRER reporters include the promoters of genes such as BiP (Binding immunoglobulin Protein) or CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein).
Select a reporter gene: Choose a reporter gene that is easy to detect and quantitate. Commonly used reporter genes include Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), Luciferase, or beta-galactosidase. The choice of reporter gene depends on the specific requirements of your experiment.
Design the reporter construct: Clone the selected UPRER-responsive promoter upstream of the chosen reporter gene. This construct should also include any necessary regulatory elements, such as enhancers and terminators, to ensure proper expression.
What is the difference between Atg8/LC3-I and Atg8/LC3-II? Why is this protein particularly interesting in cell biological research? How can you distinguish LC3-I and LC3-II and why is this distinction important?
Atg8/LC3 (Autophagy-related protein 8/microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3) is a protein involved in autophagy, a cellular process that plays a crucial role in the degradation and recycling of cellular components. The key distinction between Atg8/LC3-I and Atg8/LC3-II lies in their post-translational modifications, which are indicative of different stages of autophagic activity.
Atg8/LC3-I:
LC3-I is the cytoplasmic form of the protein.
It is synthesized in the cytoplasm and remains soluble.
LC3-I is typically found in the early stages of autophagy and is not associated with autophagosomal membranes.
Atg8/LC3-II:
LC3-II is the lipidated and membrane-bound form.
During the process of autophagy, LC3-I is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) to form LC3-II.
LC3-II is associated with the autophagosomal membrane and is involved in autophagosome elongation and closure.
Why Atg8/LC3 is Particularly Interesting in Cell Biological Research: Atg8/LC3 has become a widely used marker in autophagy research and is often employed to monitor and quantify autophagic activity. Its distinct transition from LC3-I to LC3-II is a reliable indicator of autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. Monitoring LC3 levels and the LC3-I to LC3-II conversion helps researchers study various aspects of autophagy, including its regulation, dynamics, and the impact of different cellular conditions or stimuli on the autophagic process.
We have seen that mechanistic target-of-rapamycin complex I (mTORC1) is a negative regulator of autophagy.
a. What is the main substrate of mTORC1 in the control of autophagy? Describe in few sentences how this regulation works.
b. Another phosphorylation target of mTORC1 is the protein 4E-BP. This affects gene expression in a rather general way. Describe in few words how phosphorylated 4EBP interferes with gene expression (interactor, role of the interactor, consequences: which step(s) in gene expression is/are affected?)
a. Main Substrate of mTORC1 in the Control of Autophagy: The main substrate of mTORC1 in the regulation of autophagy is ULK1 (Unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1). ULK1 is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a crucial role in the initiation of autophagy. When mTORC1 is active (under nutrient-rich conditions), it phosphorylates ULK1 at multiple sites, inhibiting its kinase activity. This phosphorylation prevents the activation of the autophagic machinery, leading to suppression of autophagy. In contrast, when mTORC1 is inhibited (under nutrient-deprived or stress conditions), ULK1 is dephosphorylated and activated, promoting autophagy initiation.
b. Phosphorylation Target of mTORC1: 4E-BP (Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E-Binding Protein): Phosphorylation of 4E-BP by mTORC1 affects gene expression at the level of translation initiation. 4E-BP normally inhibits translation initiation by binding to eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E), a key factor involved in the initiation of cap-dependent translation. When 4E-BP is phosphorylated by mTORC1, its affinity for eIF4E decreases, leading to the release of eIF4E. Released eIF4E can then associate with other initiation factors and the mRNA 5' cap, promoting the assembly of the translation initiation complex.
Consequences of Phosphorylated 4E-BP on Gene Expression:
Enhanced Translation Initiation: Phosphorylated 4E-BP releases eIF4E, allowing it to participate in the formation of the eIF4F complex. The eIF4F complex facilitates the binding of mRNA to the ribosome, promoting translation initiation. This leads to increased translation of mRNAs involved in cell growth, proliferation, and survival.
Global Impact on Gene Expression: Phosphorylation of 4E-BP by mTORC1 has a general impact on translation initiation, influencing the expression of a wide range of genes. The increased availability of eIF4E can lead to the translation of mRNAs with complex 5' UTR structures or those containing highly structured internal ribosome entry sites (IRES), which may be less dependent on eIF4E for initiation.
Cell Growth and Proliferation: The phosphorylation of 4E-BP by mTORC1 is often associated with increased protein synthesis, promoting cell growth and proliferation. This molecular mechanism plays a crucial role in coordinating cellular responses to nutrient availability and growth factor signaling.
Zuletzt geändertvor einem Jahr