Buffl

All important!!!

MM
von Max M.

Which methods can be used to improve the estimates of risk and uncertainty analysis?

  1. Empirical Methods

    • A) Reduction of Investment Recovery Period: Focus on shorter investment durations, especially for fast technological innovations with low capital intensity.

    • B) Adjustment of Assessment Rate: Increase the discount rate to reflect higher risks (e.g., WACC + risk premium).

    • C) Right Equivalent Method: Use a coefficient (0 < α < 1) to convert uncertain cash flows into certain cash flows. Lower coefficients reflect higher risks and uncertainty, especially for long-term cash flows.


  1. Simulation Methods

    • A) Sensitivity Analysis: Test project profitability by adjusting key assumptions (e.g., hydrogen fleet pricing). Focus on critical assumptions for viability.

    • B) Scenario Analysis: Create optimistic, moderate, and pessimistic scenarios based on external factors. Assign probabilities to each scenario to assess outcomes.


  2. Methods of Decision Theory

  • Focuses on situations of absolute uncertainty where future events (states of nature) are unpredictable.

  • Key Components:

    • Actions/Strategies: Decision options available.

    • Situations/Events: Uncontrollable external events impacting decisions.

    • Results/Consequences: Analyze actions for each situation to identify the optimal decision.


  1. Probabilistic Methods

    • A) Maximax Criterion: Optimistic approach; choose the best possible outcome assuming all situations have equal probability.

    • B) Maximin Criterion: Pessimistic approach; choose the option with the least potential loss.

    • C) Minimax Regret Criterion: Minimize the maximum regret or loss. Ideal under high uncertainty without scenario probabilities.

    • D) Laplace Criterion: Assume all states of nature are equally likely; calculate average payoff for each scenario and choose the best one.


State what distinguishes a root investment [Basisinvestition] from an incremental investment [Zusatzinvestition] and establish their relationship with the concepts of global cash flow and incremental cash flow

Root investment:

  1. A root investment refers to the total investment required to establish a completely new project, system, or venture from scratch.

  2. It includes all initial capital expenditures, such as infrastructure, equipment, technology, and setup costs.

  3. It is independent of any existing projects or operations and does not rely on previously incurred costs.


Incremental Investment:

  1. An incremental investment refers to the additional investment required to expand, upgrade, or improve an existing project or system.

  2. It focuses only on the added costs needed for the new component or improvement, without considering the initial costs of the existing infrastructure.


  1. Global Cash Flow:

    • Definition: Represents the total cash inflows and outflows of a project or business, including all components (initial investments, revenues, operating expenses, etc.).

    • Relevance: Root investments are primarily analyzed using global cash flow since they involve evaluating the total project cash flows from scratch.

  2. Incremental Cash Flow:

    • Definition: Refers to the additional cash inflows and outflows directly attributable to a specific change or investment (e.g., an expansion or upgrade).

    • Relevance: Incremental investments are evaluated using incremental cash flow, as only the additional financial impact of the new investment is relevant.


Summary:

—> Root investments are analyzed based on global cash flow because they involve evaluating the entire project as a whole.

—> Incremental investments are analyzed based on incremental cash flow, isolating the financial impact of the new component without considering the already existing project


In interpreting the economic results of an investment project, and in applying the evaluation criteria, state, duly justifying, whether there is any correlation between the NPV / VAL (Net Present Value) and the PRC (Pay Back Period).

NPV (Net Present Value):

  1. Definition: NPV is the difference between the present value of the cash inflows (revenues or savings) and the present value of the cash outflows (investment costs), discounted at the project’s cost of capital.

  2. Time Value of Money: NPV takes into account the time value of money, meaning that it discounts future cash flows to reflect their present value.


Payback Period:

  • Definition: The payback period is the time it takes for an investment to recover its initial cost through cumulative cash inflows.


Comparison:

Time Value of Money:

  • NPV incorporates the time value of money by discounting future cash flows, making it a more comprehensive measure of profitability.

  • PRC, on the other hand, does not consider the time value of money, which can lead to misleading conclusions if the project generates significant cash flows far in the future.

Focus:

  • NPV evaluates the total value generated by the project over its lifetime.

  • PRC only focuses on how quickly the initial investment is recovered, ignoring any cash flows that occur after the payback period is reached, and it also doesn't reflect profitability after the payback.

Risk and Uncertainty:

  • NPV provides a fuller picture of an investment's risk by considering all cash flows, including those far in the future.

  • PRC is less effective in capturing risk because it ignores the timing of cash flows beyond the payback period and does not account for the project’s profitability after recovery of the initial investment.


Conclusion:

While both NPV and PRC are valuable tools for evaluating an investment project, they focus on different aspects: NPV assesses the overall profitability and value creation over time, while PRC focuses on the risk of the initial investment recovery. There is no direct correlation between the two; however, they can complement each other in providing a fuller picture of a project’s economic results.


If the remuneration [Vergütung] required by the promoters of the project is low and the market risk premium [Marktrisikoprämie] is medium, the project has low, medium or high risk? Justify

Key Factors to Consider:

  1. Remuneration Required by Promoters:

    • The remuneration refers to the return or profit that the promoters expect to earn for taking on the risk of the project. If the required remuneration is low, it suggests that the promoters are willing to accept a relatively lower return for their investment and involvement.

    • A low remuneration usually implies that the project is perceived as less risky from the promoters' perspective, as they do not demand a high premium for taking on the risk.

  2. Market Risk Premium:

    • The market risk premium is the additional return over the risk-free rate that investors require to compensate for the risks associated with investing in the market as a whole.

    • A medium market risk premium suggests that the general market sees a moderate level of risk. It is neither overly optimistic (low risk) nor overly pessimistic (high risk), indicating that the project is subject to a normal amount of market risk.


Conclusion:

Given that the remuneration required by promoters is low (implying lower perceived risk by those directly involved in the project) and the market risk premium is medium (implying a typical level of market risk), the overall project risk would be considered medium.

Justification:

  • The low remuneration suggests that the promoters feel the project is relatively safe, but because the market risk premium is medium, the project is still exposed to typical market risks. Thus, the risk level is medium, balancing between the low promoter return expectation and the typical market risk conditions.


Author

Max M.

Informationen

Zuletzt geändert