Gender and Leadership – Historical View
-> women were expected to be caring leaders
Gender and Leadership Effectiveness
Gender differences
Women were less effective than men in military positions
Women were somewhat more effective than men in education, government, and social service organizations
Women were substantially more effective than men in middle management positions
Women were less effective when they were supervised or rated by a high number of males -> misunderstanding of leadership effectiveness, doesn’t match stereotype
The Leadership Gap
-> the top looks at the wrong data
Understanding the Labyrinth
Explanation for the leadership gap: “gender bias stemming from stereotyped expectations – “women take care and men take charge”
Stereotypes = cognitive shortcuts that influence the way people process information regarding groups and group members.
Gender stereotypes include beliefs about the attributes of men and women and prescribe how men and women ought to be.
Understanding the Labyrinth - Gender Stereotypes
pervasive, well documented, and highly resistant to change (Dodge, Gilroy, & Fenzel, 1995; Heilman, 2001)
Men are stereotyped with agentic characteristics: confidence, assertiveness, independence, rationality, & decisiveness
Women are stereotyped with communal characteristics: concern for others, sensitivity, warmth, helpfulness, & nurturance (Deaux & Kite, 1993; Heilman, 2001)
Understanding the Labyrinth – Stereotypes explain Findings
Gender stereotypes explain numerous findings
Penalties for women who violate gender stereotypes
Decision-makers influenced by homosocial reproduction, a tendency for a group to reproduce itself in its own image (Ex. Male leaders choosing male successors)
Leadership Effectiveness
This is the way to break the glass ceiling, all levels have to be addressed, so everyone has to do their part
Individual Level: self-promotion (not enough compared to men), imposter syndrome (you think you do not deserve sth.)
Organizational Level: pink quarter treats symptoms, mandatory paternity leave -> but policies to help women are important
Factors contributing to the rise of female leaders
Culture of many organizations is changing
Gendered work assumptions are being challenged
Organizations valuing flexible workers & diversity of top managers & leaders
Developing effective & supportive mentoring relationships
Adopting transformational leadership style
Improving perceptions of women’s leadership by combining communal and agentic qualities
Increasing parity in domestic responsibilities
Negotiating for valued positions and resources
Women’s foray into entrepreneurship
Becoming more assertive without losing their femininity
Application
Make it easier for women to reach top positions by
Understanding obstacles that make up the labyrinth
Initiating tactics to eradicate inequality
Prejudice still a factor and needs to be addressed with awareness
Women can manage biased perceptions of their leadership by enacting individualized consideration and inspirational motivation
Using effective negotiation techniques can enhance leadership advancement
Changes in organizational culture, women’s career development, mentoring opportunities, and increased numbers of women in strategic positions will increase presence of women in prominent leadership roles.
Learnings
pink quarter: imposter syndrome, more challenges and discrimination (fix sympotms not cause)
women systematically underestimate their ability to
more harsh to themselves -> male remember GPA slights higher, females slightly lower
women attribute success to external factors, men to internal factors
Gender discrimination e.g. rating doctors -> women pay a higher price for being late - being late breaks the stereotype = punishment (women are expected to be conscientiousness)
Gender discrimination is majorly based on expectation
white boys club: social identity, we like people that look / are like us = more likely to hire them
Success and Likeability
success and liekability is negative correlated for women
the more successful women are the less people like them
example Heidi and Howard: name for one group changed to Howard -> only first name was changed = the differences you will see are the result of gender
euqally competent
liked Howard more, would work for him, but not for Heidi
Sherly Sandberg
looks at why a smaller percentage of women than men reach the top of their professions
-> Video nochmal anschauen
we need to start to look at different levels
Zuletzt geändertvor 2 Monaten