What is meant by the term “back shift”?
Backshift is the name given to the change that is required for verbs in a reported clauses if the main/reporting clause is in the past tense.
triggered by past tense reporting verbs. If the reporting verb is in the past tense, all subsequent verb phrases undergo a *backshift (move back in time) and it triggers changes in things like pronouns and place and time adverbials.
Backshift of present simple
past simple
Backshift of present perfect
past perfect
Backshift of past
backshift of present progressive
past progressive
Backshift of present perfect progressive
past perfect progressive
Backshift of primary modal forms
secondary modal forms
Backshift of demonstrative determiners (this, that, these, those).
the
as time adverbials: this —>that; these —> those
Why no backshift?
“I left the keys on the table” —> Simon says he left the keys on the table.
The reporting verbs (says) is in the present tense, so no backshift is required.
“We had been driving for 8 hours.” —> Simon told us that they had been driving for 8 hours.
The verb in the direct speech is already past perfect. It is not possible to go any further back than past-in-the-past, so the past perfect form is maintained.
What is the semantic difference between the following utterances?
a) “I support Manchester United.”
b) John told me that he supports Manchester United.
c) John told me that he supported Manchester United.
a) true
b) Speaker assumes that John still supports Manchester United.
c) Refers to what John said in the past; current truth is left open.
Apart from back shifting the verb, what else might you have to change in reported speech?
Pronouns:
1st/2nd person change to 3rd person (unless the addressee is involved in the reporting)
3rd person need not change, but may become 1st or 2nd person.
Time/place adverbials:
Expressions of time and place
pronouns such as this/that, here /there may need to be changed
Questions and exclamation punctuation is omitted.
Is backshift required in the following cases? Why/why not?
a) I should have asked her __________ (to like) the Beatles.
b) They must have known that we _______________________________ (to be coming).
c) He may have thought that we____________________________ (to have left).
Yes, in all three cases. A modal auxiliary followed by a perfect infinitive is treated as the equivalent of a past tense form and thus triggers backshift.
If the verb in the reporting clause is in the past tense, what happens to the modal auxiliaries can, may, shall and will? What about the semi-modals must, ought, ought to and had better?
modal auxiliaries: Can, may, shall and will are usually backshifted to: could, might, should and would respectively.
semi-modals: Must, should, ought to and (had) better, on the other hand, cannot be backshifted. The form remains the same in reported speech
What is free indirect speech?
It is a very common device of narrative writing.
Involves the indirect-speech reporting of what someone has said or thought by backshifting BUT without including the reporting cluases (he said…, she thought… etc,).
Free indirect speech, unlike ordinary indirect speech can incorporate the question and exclamation structures (including punctuation) of direct speech.
e.g.
Well, it was no matter now, The dead couldn’t come back to demand an accounting from the living, and there was very little point in dwelling upon her friend’s lack of feeling for a man who’d been chosen from complete strangers to be her spouse.
diesct speech
actual words a person says while speaking
indirect speech
Indirect speech reports only the meanig of something said by another. It isn't necessarily identical to the original utterance.
modal auxiliary+perfect infinitive in indirect speech
has the same effext as a past tense reporting verb
Direct speech: "Jane is singing."
Indirect speech: You must have known that Jane was singing.
yes/no questions
svo
introduced with if
Do you want a cheese and pickle sandwich?
She asked if I wanted a cheese and pickle sandwich.
wh-questions
wh-word followed by the reporting clause
What would you like to eat?
She asked what I would like to eat.
reported clause
main clause
clause that contains reported speech
can precede ofr follow the reporting clause
reporting clause
subordinate clause
includes a reporting verb
time adverbials
undergo ahift
ago —> earlier/before
yesetrday —> the day before
Tomorrow —> the following day
last year —> the previous year
In indirect speech the backshift is limited to the reported verb phrase.
True or False?
In indirect speech a modal verb followed by the perfect infinitive triggers a back shift in the same way a past time reporting verb does?
True or false?
Do the invariant semi-modals, ought to, and had better change their form in indirect speech?
Read this:
can could
will would
shall should
may might
Decide whether the statements below are true or false.
Decide whether the statements below are right or wrong.
Read the statements belwo and decide whether they are right or wrong.
First person pronouns usually change to third person pronouns in indirect speech?
Read the statements below. Mark all the statements which are correct.
English has a particular tense & aspect combination that indicates indirect speech.
Zuletzt geändertvor 21 Tagen