..

1. What were facts of the case?

2. What was procedure?

3. What were the issues?

4. What rule/law did court apply?

5. What was the holding?

6. What was the reasoning?

7. What was the conclusion for the case?

8. What is your opinion about the case?

Einzelanwalt

Kanzlei eines Barristers

Berufsvereinigung von Barristern

official confirming that certain person has signed specific document

judge working in a lower court

legal research, public speech amd case analysis

a barrister who is chosen to represent the British royal family in a court of law

Legal Practice Course <-> Bar Professional Training

training contract <-> pupilage

two years <-> one year

lawyer in Scotland

• 10%

• works for his own account

• legal experts

• 90%

• case manager

• collects evidence

• deals with client

• generalist

• US: assistant to judge

• Engl: office manager, works for barrister

no plural s

• certifies signatures

• commisioner of oaths

• impartial witness

• laypeople

• notarization

• notary public

When using the Socratic Method, professors will have a student attempt to summarize a case, followed up by a grilling of questions. These questions can sometimes include a manipulation of facts to challenge the student in the hot seat.

• ius civile für Römer & gentium für Fremde

Codex Iuris Civilis

Digest (kind of legal encylopedia, also Pandects)

Institutions (textbook fpr students)

fourth part (collected by jurists of Justinian): Novels

• 1088: from here on Roman Law rediscovered in Europes first law school in Bologna

• 1804: Code Napoleon released and replaced ius commune

• 527: Justinian comes to power

• 1900: BGB

• dogmatic, abstract, systematic

• civil codification is binding, all encompassing, uniform in application