writ-system
was highly formalised and did not provide for a writ for every legal or factual problem people had at the time -> Wheres no writ, theres no right (common law in strict sense)
writ
was permission of the king given to his royal justices to strt a particular law suit and to assemble a jury
civil law principle opposed to where theres no writ theres no right
ubi ius remedium (wo ein Recht da ein Rechtsbehelf)
Equity
developed over the centuries because of the limitations of the writ-system -> when people were denied access to justice in cases where no appropriate writ existed, they started petitioning th King as the Fountain of Justice, who decided outsied the writ and court system only on basis of justice, farness and reasobleness
uses maxims instead of precedent cases
rescission
Vertragsaufhebung
litigant
Streitpartei
plaintiff
Kläger
itinerant
reisend -> itinerant justices
specific performance
remedy that could not be obtained under common law but later became one of so called equitable remedies
damages
most important writ-based common law remedy
features of common law
inductive, flexible, serving individual justice
equity: terms associated
Provisions of Oxford, forms of action
equitable remedies
injunction, specific perf, acc for profits
maxim of equity
clean hands, in personam, cloak for fraud
lord chancellor: terms associated
Kings Secretary, Canon lawyer, father of equity
historicsal figure common law
William I, Henry II, William Blackstone
chronology
before 1066 no unified legal system in Engl
Henry II introduced reforms -> writ-system (major remedy: damages)
Equity developed to balance writs
Equity delegated from King to Lord Chancellor
Maxims developed
today Equity still part of common law legal systems
pursuant to
gemäß
Last changeda year ago