Which strategies do fungi use to attack the plant cell without triggering plant-defence (in apoplast)?
Chitin deacetylation
only aminogroup at chitin molecule —> molecules can’t be detected by PRR —> fungi are camouflaged (example: Uromyces)
masking of chitin polymers
effector AVR4 (from Cladiosporium fluvum, biotrophic fungus) has similarity with chitin binding domain (ChBD) from invertebrates
AVR4 binds specifically to chitin present in fungal cell walls in plants (like a shield)
protects fungal cell walls from hydrolysis by plant chitinases
scavenging of chitin fragments
ECP6 scavengers all chitin molecules in the apoplast before they can be detected by CERK —> ECP6 has a higher affinity (Kd 280 pM) to (GlcNAc)6 than to CERK1 (44.8 µM)
ECP6 binds chitin via LysM domains and sequesteres chitin oligosaccharides
How do (fungal) effectors enter the plant’s cytoplasm? How are effectors generally composed?
many oomycete effectors have a highly conserved RxLR-dEER motif
this motif is a plant uptake signal
Effectors have a signal peptide (=secretory signal), a RxLR motif (=plant uptake signal) and an effector domain (=target within plant cell)
effector domain responsible for targeting different subcellular components of the plant (e.g. vacuole for release of plant’s toxins, membrane for destroying transporter proteins)
What are the general functions of cytoplasmic effectors?
suppression of plant immune responses at multiple levels
are required for developmental/metabolic reprogramming
What are type III effectors and what do they do?
bacterial effectors that are delivered into the plant cell via the type III secretion system (T3SS)
type III effectors target key components of the PAMP triggered immunity (PTI)
e.g. some effectors target BIK1 or other receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases that mediate PTI signaling or MAPK
Which plant host proteins do type III effectors post-translationally modify and how?
BIK1
AvrAC functions as a uridine-5’-monophosphate transferase
AvrAC adds uridine 5’-monophosphate to and conceals phosphorylation sites in the activation loop of BIK1 —> BIK1 phosphorylation sites are masked, BIK1 is therefore inactive
think of spallek ZAR1 (CNL) signaling —> PBL2 is decoy for BIK1
MAPK
the activation loop must be phosphorylated to activate plant kinases
HopAl1 irreversibly removes the phosphate group from the threonine (functions as a phosphothreonine lyase)
with inactive MAPK, PAMP triggered immunity is suppressed
PRRs (FLS2, BAK1, CERK1)
AvrPtoB functions as E3 ubiquitin ligase —> ubiquitinates FLS2, BAK1, CERK1 thus mediating their degradation
What are transcription activator-like (TAL) effectors?
bacterial effectors
TALs mimick transcription factors and turn on host genes needed by the pathogen
e.g. Xanthomonas AvrBs3
TAL effectors bind to a specific TAL-box (=UPA-box) in the plant promoter which leads to the transcription of susceptibility genes and therefore to disease
What is AvrBs3, how is it composed and what does it do (+mechanism)?
bacterial TAL effector
AvrBs3 has 17,5 repeats of 34 amino acids that can bind DNA in plant promoters
AvrBs3 modulates plant gene expression and induces cell hypertrophy by mimicking host transcription factors
induces several pepper genes, all with a conserved cis element: UPA (UPregulated by Avrbs3) box
TALs bind to conserved region of the upa promoter
What are biotechnological applications of TALENLs?
TALENS (=transcription activator-like effector nuclease)
can be used for genome editing: between TALs, unspecific dimeric DNA-endonuclease is inserted
—> homology-dependent repair or erroneous non-homologous end-joining —> genome editing (specific genes can be targeted)
Last changed5 months ago