Buffl

Installment_04

IF
by Immanuel F.

In the following there are 5 fallacies, explain why they are not entirely correct

  1. Firms should make an asset, rather than buy it, if that asset is a source of competitive advantage for that firm

  2. Firms should buy, rather than make, to avoid the costs of making the product

  3. Firms should make, rather than buy, to avoid paying a profit margin to independent firms

  4. Firms should make, rather than buy, because a vertically integrated producer will be able to avoid paying high market prices for the input during periods of peak demand or scarce supply

  5. Firms should make, rather than buy, to tie up a distribution channel, they. Will gain market share at the expenses of rivals

Fallacy 1:

  • argument is not correct

  • A source which you can buy easily at the market is not a source of competitive advantage for a firm, because it is not rare. Other competitors can also buy them on the market

Fallacy 2:

  • Argument is not correct

  • Make or buy decision does not eliminate production costs, it only shifts wo bears them. Outsorcing doesn’t make these costs disappear - they are simply transferred to an external supplier

Fallacy 3:

  • argument is not correct

  • This decision shouldn't be based on avoiding a supplier’s profit margin. Economic profitability, not accounting profits, should guide this choice, as profits upstream dont automatically mean benefits downstream

Fallacy 4:

  • argument not entirely correct

  • Peak prices can be avoided by long term contracts with suppliers

  • Insolvency risk of high input prices can be addressed by building a capital reserve

Fallacy 5:

  • argument is valuable sometimes, but it is used to justify acquisitions on many other occasions when it lacks merit (merit = verdienst)

Author

Immanuel F.

Information

Last changed