Allocation sizing for FoF structure
Individual investors
Allocation < $50mm
Considering fees and due diligence
Four Functions of FoF Management
Strategy and manager selection
Portfolio construction
Risk management and monitoring
Manager due diligence
Benefit Types of FoFs
Portfolio Benefits
Cost & Scale Advantages
Institutional Edges
—> Total: 11 benefits
FoF Benefits: Portfolio Benefits
Diversification
Liquidity
Currency hedging
Leverage
FoF Benefits: Cost & Scale Advantages
Economies of scale
Negotiated fees
Accessibility
FoF Benefits: Institutional Edge
Information advantage
Access to certain managers
Regulation
Education
Disadvantage Types of FoFs
Costs & Taxes
Governance & Information
-> Total: 6 disadvantages
FoF Disadvantages: Costs & Taxes
Double layer of fees
Performance fees not netted
Taxation
FoF Disadvantages: Governance & Information
Lack of transparency
Lack of control
Exposure to other LP’s cash flows
Three Ways for FoF Managers to Add Value
Long-term strategic style allocation (Beta)
Short-term tactical style allocation (Alpha)
Individual manager selection (Alpha)
Benefits of PE FoFs vs. In-House Program
Expertise in fund selection
Diversification (lower capital commitments & spread costs)
Access to LPs and liquidity management
Proper Management Incentives
Costs of PE FoFs vs. In-House Program
Second layer of management fees
Relationships with GPs remain with FoF
Less transparency and control
Lack of liquidity in FoF units
PE FoFs Investment Considerations
Investment Objective
Geography, style (VC/buyout), level of diversification
Type of FoF
Primary vs. secondary
PE FoFs Investment Process
Portfolio Construction (top down; strategic weights)
Manager and fund selection (bottom up; to build up to strategic weights)
Monitoring
Factors Driving PE FoF Market
Easy access for new, smaller PE investors
Complement to LP funds / directs
Operational & regulatory complexities
PE FoF Historical Performance
PE FoFs offer diversification by reducing performance dispersion vs. single PE funds
PE FoFs outperform public markets
Buyout FoFs underperform individual buyout funds
VC FoFs perform on par with individual VC funds
Diversification in Hedge Funds
Well diversified portfolio: 15-20 HFs
Theory: S / Wurzel (N)
S = SD of funds
N = number of funds
Empirical Evidence on FoHF
FoHFs underperform broad hedge fund indices
Reasons that FoHFs may be less biased than indices
Inaccurate index performance (survivorship bias / history bias)
Fund of Funds use realistic investment weights, not theoretical
What are Liquid Hedge Fund Alternatives
Investment strategy seeking HF exposures but offered in regulated, liquid vehicles
Greater transparency, liquidity and investor protection
Governing Liquid Hedge Fund Alternatives Regulations
UCITS (Europe)
‘40 Act (U.S.)
Regulations Coverage
Reporting
Key UCITS Regulations
Reporting frequency: 2 weeks
Leverage: 200%
Strict holding and concentrations
UCITS Holding Limits
35% European sovereign
20% investment fund
10% illiquid holdings
20% deposit at single institution
Max position: 10% (20% with derivatives)
Key ‘40 Act Regulations
Liquidity within 7 days
Symmetric performance fees
Min. 300% asset coverage for borrowing —> borrowing limited to 33% of assets
‘40 Act Holding Limits
Apply to 75% of the fund:
Max 5% in a single security
Max 25% in one industry
15% maximum illiquid holdings
Max 10% ownership of any single issuer
Strategies available in Liquid Alternative Funds
Macro and managed futures
Long/short equity
Equity market neutral
Relative value strategies
Multi-alternative Structures in Liquid Alternatives
Combine sub-funds / sleeves
Bypass leverage / concentration limits at fund level
Lower risk -> slightly lower / equivalent returns to HFs
FoHF Investment Objective
Invest in many Hedge Funds
Risk reduction through diversification
Different baskets —> smoother returns
FoHF Investment Objective: Buckets
Conservative Index
Market Defensive Index
Strategic Index
Composite and Diversified Index
FoHF Investment Objective: Conservative Index
Low volatility -> capital preservation
Minimal market (beta) exposure
Strategies: Equity neutral, Fixed Income / Convertible Arbitrage
FoHF Investment Objective: Market Defensive Index
Hedge Market Risk
Performs best in market downturns
Strategies: Systematic & Short-Biased
FoHF Investment Objective: Strategic Index
High Absolute Returns
Directional Market Exposure
Strategies: Equity hedge and Emerging Markets
FoHF Investment Objective: Composite and Diversified Indices
Mix of HF strategies
Diversified Returns
Performance World Equities
Higher return (5.6%)
High volatility (13.9%)
Negative skew with mild tail risk
Performance Market Defensive Index
Moderate return (4.1%)
Low volatility (4.1%)
Near-normal return distribution
Performance Diversified Index
Low return (3.6%)
Moderate volatility (4.4%)
Negative skew and tail risk
Performance Strategic Index
Higher volatility (6.4%)
Negative skew with tail risk
Performance Conservative Index
Low average return (3.4%)
Low volatility (3.3%)
Negative skew and high tail risk
Fee Netting
Multistrategy fund -> all gains/losses are added together
Pay fee only when total result is positive
Seeding Funds
Invest in newly formed HF
Provide capital and Guidance
VC for HF
Nontraditional Bond Funds
Invest in investment-grade, high yield, emerging market debt
Use leverage
Short positions
Last changed22 days ago